TY - JOUR
T1 - A Family Booklet About Comfort Care in Advanced Dementia
T2 - Three-Country Evaluation
AU - van der Steen, Jenny T.
AU - Arcand, Marcel
AU - Toscani, Franco
AU - de Graas, Tjomme
AU - Finetti, Silvia
AU - Beaulieu, Marie
AU - Brazil, Kevin
AU - Nakanishi, Miharu
AU - Nakashima, Taeko
AU - Knol, Dirk L.
AU - Hertogh, Cees M.P.M.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Research Center on Aging from the Health and Social Services Centre-University Institute of Geriatrics of Sherbrooke (Canada), the Lino Maestroni Foundation—Palliative Medicine Research Institute (Italy), the national insurance companies Agis Zorgverzekeringen and Fonds NutsOhra , and by Stichting Sluyterman van Loo – stimuleringsfonds ouderenprojecten (national agency that supports projects focused on wellbeing of the elderly) (the Netherlands). J.T.S. was supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO, the Hague; Innovational Research Incentives Scheme, a career award to J.T.S. [grant number Veni 916.66.073 ]), and the Department of Nursing Home Medicine , and the Department of Public and Occupational Health of the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center , Amsterdam.
PY - 2012/5
Y1 - 2012/5
N2 - Objectives: To evaluate a booklet on comfort care in dementia from the perspective of family with relevant experience, and assess nursing home resident and family factors associated with evaluations. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Long term care facilities in French-speaking Canada, and the Netherlands and Italy. Participants: Bereaved family (n = 138). Measurements: An 8-item scale assessed the booklet's acceptability. Usefulness was rated on a 0 to 10 scale, and perceived usefulness referred to usefulness if family had had the booklet during the resident's stay. Families indicated preferred ways of obtaining, and the most appropriate time to get the booklet. Results: Almost all families (94%) perceived the booklet as useful. Canadian and Dutch families evaluated the booklet's contents and format favorably, whereas Italian families' evaluations were less favorable. Almost all families endorsed roles for physicians or nurses and about half additionally accepted availability through own initiative, in print or through the Internet. Preference of timing was highly variable. Better acceptability, usefulness, and availability through own initiative were independently associated with non-Italian nationality, presence of more physical signs discussed in the booklet, feeling ill-prepared, and higher satisfaction with care. A preference of receiving the booklet early was more likely in Italian families, those without university education, and those involved with older residents. Conclusion: The booklet is suitable to inform Dutch and Canadian families on comfort care in dementia, but implementation in Italy requires further consideration. The booklet may be integrated in advance care planning in long term care, and made available outside long term care settings to serve families who wish to be informed early.
AB - Objectives: To evaluate a booklet on comfort care in dementia from the perspective of family with relevant experience, and assess nursing home resident and family factors associated with evaluations. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Long term care facilities in French-speaking Canada, and the Netherlands and Italy. Participants: Bereaved family (n = 138). Measurements: An 8-item scale assessed the booklet's acceptability. Usefulness was rated on a 0 to 10 scale, and perceived usefulness referred to usefulness if family had had the booklet during the resident's stay. Families indicated preferred ways of obtaining, and the most appropriate time to get the booklet. Results: Almost all families (94%) perceived the booklet as useful. Canadian and Dutch families evaluated the booklet's contents and format favorably, whereas Italian families' evaluations were less favorable. Almost all families endorsed roles for physicians or nurses and about half additionally accepted availability through own initiative, in print or through the Internet. Preference of timing was highly variable. Better acceptability, usefulness, and availability through own initiative were independently associated with non-Italian nationality, presence of more physical signs discussed in the booklet, feeling ill-prepared, and higher satisfaction with care. A preference of receiving the booklet early was more likely in Italian families, those without university education, and those involved with older residents. Conclusion: The booklet is suitable to inform Dutch and Canadian families on comfort care in dementia, but implementation in Italy requires further consideration. The booklet may be integrated in advance care planning in long term care, and made available outside long term care settings to serve families who wish to be informed early.
KW - Advance care planning
KW - Decision aid
KW - Decision making
KW - Dementia
KW - Nursing homes
KW - Palliative care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860340170&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860340170&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jamda.2011.02.005
DO - 10.1016/j.jamda.2011.02.005
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84860340170
SN - 1525-8610
VL - 13
SP - 368
EP - 375
JO - Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
JF - Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
IS - 4
ER -