TY - JOUR
T1 - A phase 2 randomized study of TAS-102 versus topotecan or amrubicin in patients requiring second-line chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer refractory or sensitive to frontline platinum-based chemotherapy
AU - Scagliotti, Giorgio
AU - Nishio, Makoto
AU - Satouchi, Miyako
AU - Valmadre, Giuseppe
AU - Niho, Seiji
AU - Galetta, Domenico
AU - Cortinovis, Diego
AU - Benedetti, Fabio
AU - Yoshihara, Eiji
AU - Makris, Lukas
AU - Inoue, Akira
AU - Kubota, Kaoru
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded by Taiho Oncology , Inc., which contributed to study design, data analysis, and data interpretation. The authors contributed to study design, and to the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data. All authors contributed to the research, writing, and reviewing of all drafts of this manuscript, and approved the final draft. They were responsible for all editorial decisions of the article. They received no honoraria related to its development. Editorial support in the preparation of this publication was provided by Phase Five Communications, supported by Taiho Oncology, Inc.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd
PY - 2016/10/1
Y1 - 2016/10/1
N2 - Objectives TAS-102 is an oral combination treatment comprised of an antimetabolite, trifluridine, a thymidine-based nucleoside analog, and tipiracil hydrochloride, at a molar ratio of 1:0.5. This antimetabolite has demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials, including a global phase 3 trial in metastatic colorectal cancer. As this agent has shown activity greater than cisplatin in small cell lung cancer xenograft mouse models, the objective of this study was to evaluate TAS-102 in the second-line treatment of small cell lung cancer. Methods This was a multicenter, open-label, two-arm, randomized phase 2 study designed to compare oral TAS-102 (35 mg/m2/dose twice daily) versus control (topotecan or amrubicin). Patients requiring second-line chemotherapy for treatment of small cell lung cancer, either refractory or sensitive to frontline platinum-based chemotherapy, were enrolled. Results Eighteen patients were enrolled. Eight of nine patients receiving TAS-102 discontinued treatment due to progressive disease and one patient died due to clinical progression during the safety follow-up. Unplanned interim futility considerations were made, and the study was terminated early because it was unlikely that superiority of TAS-102 versus comparator could be demonstrated. Six control patients discontinued therapy due to progressive disease and one due to an adverse event. Median progression-free survival was 1.4 months (range 0.9–1.8) versus 2.7 months (range 1.0–6.8) for TAS-102 and control, respectively, with a hazard ratio of 3.76 (80% CI, 1.68–8.40) favoring control. The most common adverse events with TAS-102 were neutropenia, diarrhea, anemia, anorexia, and fatigue, each in three patients. Conclusion TAS-102 showed no evidence of activity in second-line small cell lung cancer.
AB - Objectives TAS-102 is an oral combination treatment comprised of an antimetabolite, trifluridine, a thymidine-based nucleoside analog, and tipiracil hydrochloride, at a molar ratio of 1:0.5. This antimetabolite has demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials, including a global phase 3 trial in metastatic colorectal cancer. As this agent has shown activity greater than cisplatin in small cell lung cancer xenograft mouse models, the objective of this study was to evaluate TAS-102 in the second-line treatment of small cell lung cancer. Methods This was a multicenter, open-label, two-arm, randomized phase 2 study designed to compare oral TAS-102 (35 mg/m2/dose twice daily) versus control (topotecan or amrubicin). Patients requiring second-line chemotherapy for treatment of small cell lung cancer, either refractory or sensitive to frontline platinum-based chemotherapy, were enrolled. Results Eighteen patients were enrolled. Eight of nine patients receiving TAS-102 discontinued treatment due to progressive disease and one patient died due to clinical progression during the safety follow-up. Unplanned interim futility considerations were made, and the study was terminated early because it was unlikely that superiority of TAS-102 versus comparator could be demonstrated. Six control patients discontinued therapy due to progressive disease and one due to an adverse event. Median progression-free survival was 1.4 months (range 0.9–1.8) versus 2.7 months (range 1.0–6.8) for TAS-102 and control, respectively, with a hazard ratio of 3.76 (80% CI, 1.68–8.40) favoring control. The most common adverse events with TAS-102 were neutropenia, diarrhea, anemia, anorexia, and fatigue, each in three patients. Conclusion TAS-102 showed no evidence of activity in second-line small cell lung cancer.
KW - Amrubicin
KW - Randomized trial
KW - Small cell lung cancer
KW - TAS-102
KW - Topotecan
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979742548&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84979742548&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.06.023
DO - 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.06.023
M3 - Article
C2 - 27597276
AN - SCOPUS:84979742548
SN - 0169-5002
VL - 100
SP - 20
EP - 23
JO - Lung Cancer
JF - Lung Cancer
ER -