TY - JOUR
T1 - A shady phytoplankton paradox
T2 - When phytoplankton increases under low light
AU - Yamamichi, Masato
AU - Kazama, Takehiro
AU - Tokita, Kotaro
AU - Katano, Izumi
AU - Doi, Hideyuki
AU - Yoshida, Takehito
AU - Hairston, Nelson G.
AU - Urabe, Jotaro
N1 - Funding Information:
This project was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI) 15H02642 to J.U., M.Y., I.K., H.D. and T.Y., 16K18618 and 16H04846 to M.Y., 15K00596 to I.K., 25281052 and 26291088 to T.Y., and 25291094 and 16H02522 to J.U. M.Y. was supported by Hakubi Center for Advanced Research and John Mung Program of Kyoto University. We thank N. Hamm and R. L. Johnson for managing the experimental ponds, L. R. Schaffner and X. Yin for helping with field and laboratory work, B. E. Miner for his helpful advice, and T. Fukami, S. Diehl and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the earlier version of the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/7/11
Y1 - 2018/7/11
N2 - Light is a fundamental driver of ecosystem dynamics, affecting the rate of photosynthesis and primary production. In spite of its importance, less is known about its community-scale effects on aquatic ecosystems compared with those of nutrient loading. Understanding light limitation is also important for ecosystem management, as human activities have been rapidly altering light availability to aquatic ecosystems. Here we show that decreasing light can paradoxically increase phytoplankton abundance in shallow lakes. Our results, based on field manipulation experiments, field observations and models, suggest that, under competition for light and nutrients between phytoplankton and submersed macrophytes, alternative stable states are possible under high-light supply. In a macrophyte-dominated state, as light decreases phytoplankton density increases, because macrophytes (which effectively compete for nutrients released from the sediment) are more severely affected by light reduction. Our results demonstrate how species interactions with spatial heterogeneity can cause an unexpected outcome in complex ecosystems. An implication of our findings is that partial surface shading for controlling harmful algal bloom may, counterintuitively, increase phytoplankton abundance by decreasing macrophytes. Therefore, to predict how shallow lake ecosystems respond to environmental perturbations, it is essential to consider effects of light on the interactions between pelagic and benthic producers.
AB - Light is a fundamental driver of ecosystem dynamics, affecting the rate of photosynthesis and primary production. In spite of its importance, less is known about its community-scale effects on aquatic ecosystems compared with those of nutrient loading. Understanding light limitation is also important for ecosystem management, as human activities have been rapidly altering light availability to aquatic ecosystems. Here we show that decreasing light can paradoxically increase phytoplankton abundance in shallow lakes. Our results, based on field manipulation experiments, field observations and models, suggest that, under competition for light and nutrients between phytoplankton and submersed macrophytes, alternative stable states are possible under high-light supply. In a macrophyte-dominated state, as light decreases phytoplankton density increases, because macrophytes (which effectively compete for nutrients released from the sediment) are more severely affected by light reduction. Our results demonstrate how species interactions with spatial heterogeneity can cause an unexpected outcome in complex ecosystems. An implication of our findings is that partial surface shading for controlling harmful algal bloom may, counterintuitively, increase phytoplankton abundance by decreasing macrophytes. Therefore, to predict how shallow lake ecosystems respond to environmental perturbations, it is essential to consider effects of light on the interactions between pelagic and benthic producers.
KW - Alternative stable states
KW - Asymmetry
KW - Competition
KW - Interspecific interactions
KW - Light environments
KW - Shallow lake
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050016853&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050016853&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1098/rspb.2018.1067
DO - 10.1098/rspb.2018.1067
M3 - Article
C2 - 30051833
AN - SCOPUS:85050016853
SN - 0962-8452
VL - 285
JO - Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
JF - Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
IS - 1882
M1 - 20181067
ER -