TY - JOUR
T1 - Active reduction of noise by additional noise source and its limit
AU - Kido, Ken’iti
AU - Kanai, Hiroshi
AU - Abe, Masato
PY - 1989/10
Y1 - 1989/10
N2 - This paper describes further investigations of an active noise control system in which an additional sound source is set close to the primary (noise) source. Successful application of this method to duct noise control has already been reported [Kido, 1987). The synthesized sound radiated by the additional source is identical to that of the primary source, except in polarity. The additional and primary sources form a dipole sound source with reduced effective radiation power. In theory, the distance between these two sound sources should be much less than the shortest wavelength in the required frequency range to realize an ideal dipole source. Then, the total sound pressure would be expected to attenuate in proportion to the square of the distance from the center of the sources, and little sound power would be radiated. However, in practice, the distance cannot be set small enough, so there is only a relatively small area around the dipole where the sound pressure attenuates in proportion to the square of the distance. Further afield, it attenuates in direct proportion to distance. Noise reduction is therefore limited. This paper describes the effects and the limits of performance of such a system as a function of wavelength and the dimensions of sound sources.
AB - This paper describes further investigations of an active noise control system in which an additional sound source is set close to the primary (noise) source. Successful application of this method to duct noise control has already been reported [Kido, 1987). The synthesized sound radiated by the additional source is identical to that of the primary source, except in polarity. The additional and primary sources form a dipole sound source with reduced effective radiation power. In theory, the distance between these two sound sources should be much less than the shortest wavelength in the required frequency range to realize an ideal dipole source. Then, the total sound pressure would be expected to attenuate in proportion to the square of the distance from the center of the sources, and little sound power would be radiated. However, in practice, the distance cannot be set small enough, so there is only a relatively small area around the dipole where the sound pressure attenuates in proportion to the square of the distance. Further afield, it attenuates in direct proportion to distance. Noise reduction is therefore limited. This paper describes the effects and the limits of performance of such a system as a function of wavelength and the dimensions of sound sources.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024749332&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024749332&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1115/1.3269886
DO - 10.1115/1.3269886
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0024749332
SN - 1048-9002
VL - 111
SP - 480
EP - 485
JO - Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, Transactions of the ASME
JF - Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, Transactions of the ASME
IS - 4
ER -