TY - JOUR
T1 - Adherence and Persistence with First-Line Therapy and Compliance with Glaucoma Guidelines Using Japanese Health Care/Pharmacy Claims Database
AU - Shirai, Chikako
AU - Matsuoka, Nobushige
AU - Nakazawa, Toru
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was financially supported by Pfizer Japan, Inc. The authors are grateful to Yuji Yamamoto, MD, MBA, MinaCare Co., Ltd for supplying the data for this study.
Publisher Copyright:
© Chikako Shirai, Nobushige Matsuoka, and Toru Nakazawa 2021; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
PY - 2021/1/1
Y1 - 2021/1/1
N2 - Purpose: This study evaluated Japanese patients' adherence to first-line therapy and physicians' compliance with the guidelines (GLs) for glaucoma in daily practice. Methods: This retrospective, noninterventional cohort study used a Japanese health care/pharmacy claims database from 2011 to 2016. We compared adherence based on the primary outcomes assessed as proportion of days covered (PDC) and persistence between patients who received first-line monotherapy followed by second-line fixed-combination therapy (GL-compliant cohort) and those who received first-line fixed-combination therapy (GL-noncompliant cohort). Furthermore, we explored treatment patterns, glaucoma consultation, and key factors associated with GL noncompliance. Results: Among 11,666 patients who received first-line therapy, 1,183 (10.1%) and 542 (4.6%) were in the GL-compliant and GL-noncompliant cohorts, respectively. Prostaglandin (70.7%) and subsequent prostaglandin/β blocker (BB) (20.9%) within 12 months were most used by the GL-compliant cohort. Prostaglandin/BB (48.9%) and carbonic anhydrase inhibitor/BB (51.1%) were prescribed for the GL-noncompliant cohort. The mean PDC [standard deviation (SD)], persistence rate (95% confidence interval), and consultation (SD) over 12 months were 60.9% (34.0), 16.0% (14.0-18.1), and 5.23 (3.21) times, respectively, in the GL-compliant cohort and 59.7% (35.8), 22.0% (18.6-25.5), and 4.76 (3.19) times, respectively, in the GL-noncompliant cohort. No significant differences were observed between the 2 cohorts. No clinically relevant factor associated with GL noncompliance was found. Conclusions: Around 5% of patients were prescribed a fixed-combination eye drop as first-line therapy not in accordance with GLs. The similarity of adherence and persistence between the 2 cohorts indicates that first-line fixed-combination therapy could be considered for glaucoma treatment.
AB - Purpose: This study evaluated Japanese patients' adherence to first-line therapy and physicians' compliance with the guidelines (GLs) for glaucoma in daily practice. Methods: This retrospective, noninterventional cohort study used a Japanese health care/pharmacy claims database from 2011 to 2016. We compared adherence based on the primary outcomes assessed as proportion of days covered (PDC) and persistence between patients who received first-line monotherapy followed by second-line fixed-combination therapy (GL-compliant cohort) and those who received first-line fixed-combination therapy (GL-noncompliant cohort). Furthermore, we explored treatment patterns, glaucoma consultation, and key factors associated with GL noncompliance. Results: Among 11,666 patients who received first-line therapy, 1,183 (10.1%) and 542 (4.6%) were in the GL-compliant and GL-noncompliant cohorts, respectively. Prostaglandin (70.7%) and subsequent prostaglandin/β blocker (BB) (20.9%) within 12 months were most used by the GL-compliant cohort. Prostaglandin/BB (48.9%) and carbonic anhydrase inhibitor/BB (51.1%) were prescribed for the GL-noncompliant cohort. The mean PDC [standard deviation (SD)], persistence rate (95% confidence interval), and consultation (SD) over 12 months were 60.9% (34.0), 16.0% (14.0-18.1), and 5.23 (3.21) times, respectively, in the GL-compliant cohort and 59.7% (35.8), 22.0% (18.6-25.5), and 4.76 (3.19) times, respectively, in the GL-noncompliant cohort. No significant differences were observed between the 2 cohorts. No clinically relevant factor associated with GL noncompliance was found. Conclusions: Around 5% of patients were prescribed a fixed-combination eye drop as first-line therapy not in accordance with GLs. The similarity of adherence and persistence between the 2 cohorts indicates that first-line fixed-combination therapy could be considered for glaucoma treatment.
KW - adherence
KW - claims data
KW - fixed-combination therapy
KW - glaucoma
KW - latanoprost
KW - persistence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099729723&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85099729723&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1089/jop.2020.0096
DO - 10.1089/jop.2020.0096
M3 - Article
C2 - 33370214
AN - SCOPUS:85099729723
SN - 1080-7683
VL - 37
SP - 35
EP - 44
JO - Journal of Ocular Pharmacology
JF - Journal of Ocular Pharmacology
IS - 1
ER -