TY - JOUR
T1 - Airway management in a patient with Williams syndrome
AU - Kanaya, Akihiro
AU - Yasuda, Tadanobu
AU - Kojima, Akiko
AU - Saishu, Toshio
AU - Kurosawa, Shin
PY - 2011/10/10
Y1 - 2011/10/10
N2 - Williams syndrome is characterized by the triad of supravalvular aortic stenosis (SAS), mental retardation and elfin facies. Generally, difficult airway is expected in patients with Williams syndrome by characteristic face. A 26-year-old female with Williams syndrome was scheduled for abdominal myomectomy under general anesthesia. Difficult mask ventilation and tracheal intubation were anticipated because of micrognathia, mandibular retrusion, and a Mallanpati classIII airway. Before induction of anesthesia the patient breathed 100% oxygen for 3 minutes. Anesthesia was induced and maintained with propofol, remifentanil and rocuronium bromide. Mask ventilation was easily performed. The direct laryngoscopy view was Cormack grade I and there was no difficulty in the tracheal intubation. After induction of anesthesia, anesthetic course was uneventful. According to the most previous clinical reports in patients with Williams syndrome in Japan, mask ventilation and tracheal intubation were performed easily contrary to preoperative airway assessment. In view of SAS, mental retardation, airway deformity and airway assessment in previous clinical reports, we should select the optimal strategy for airway management in patients with Williams syndrome.
AB - Williams syndrome is characterized by the triad of supravalvular aortic stenosis (SAS), mental retardation and elfin facies. Generally, difficult airway is expected in patients with Williams syndrome by characteristic face. A 26-year-old female with Williams syndrome was scheduled for abdominal myomectomy under general anesthesia. Difficult mask ventilation and tracheal intubation were anticipated because of micrognathia, mandibular retrusion, and a Mallanpati classIII airway. Before induction of anesthesia the patient breathed 100% oxygen for 3 minutes. Anesthesia was induced and maintained with propofol, remifentanil and rocuronium bromide. Mask ventilation was easily performed. The direct laryngoscopy view was Cormack grade I and there was no difficulty in the tracheal intubation. After induction of anesthesia, anesthetic course was uneventful. According to the most previous clinical reports in patients with Williams syndrome in Japan, mask ventilation and tracheal intubation were performed easily contrary to preoperative airway assessment. In view of SAS, mental retardation, airway deformity and airway assessment in previous clinical reports, we should select the optimal strategy for airway management in patients with Williams syndrome.
KW - Airway management
KW - General anesthesia
KW - Williams syndrome
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054835394&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80054835394&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 22111359
AN - SCOPUS:80054835394
SN - 0021-4892
VL - 60
SP - 1176
EP - 1179
JO - Japanese Journal of Anesthesiology
JF - Japanese Journal of Anesthesiology
IS - 10
ER -