TY - JOUR
T1 - Alloy design by tailoring phase stability in commercial Ti alloys
AU - Zhao, G. H.
AU - Liang, X. Z.
AU - Xu, X.
AU - Gamża, M. B.
AU - Mao, H.
AU - Louzguine-Luzgin, D. V.
AU - Rivera-Díaz-del-Castillo, P. E.J.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work is supported by Designing Alloys for Resource Efficiency (DARE) grant EP/L025213/1 from the UK Engineering and Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC) . PEJRDC is grateful to the Royal Academy of Engineering for Chair sponsorship via grant RCSRF1718/5/32 .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s)
PY - 2021/5/20
Y1 - 2021/5/20
N2 - The mechanical characteristics and the operative deformation mechanisms of a metallic alloy can be optimised by explicitly controlling phase stability. Here an integrated thermoelastic and pseudoelastic model is presented to evaluate the β stability in Ti alloys. The energy landscape of β→α′/α″ martensitic transformation was expressed in terms of the dilatational and transformational strain energy, the Gibbs free energy change, the external mechanical work as well as the internal frictional resistance. To test the model, new alloys were developed by tailoring two base alloys, Ti–6Al–4V and Ti–6Al–7Nb, with the addition of β-stabilising element Mo. The alloys exhibited versatile mechanical behaviours with enhanced plasticity. Martensitic nucleation and growth was fundamentally dominated by the competition between elastic strain energy and chemical driving force, where the latter term tends to lower the transformational energy barrier. The model incorporates thermodynamics and micromechanics to quantitatively investigate the threshold energy for operating transformation-induced plasticity and further guides alloy design.
AB - The mechanical characteristics and the operative deformation mechanisms of a metallic alloy can be optimised by explicitly controlling phase stability. Here an integrated thermoelastic and pseudoelastic model is presented to evaluate the β stability in Ti alloys. The energy landscape of β→α′/α″ martensitic transformation was expressed in terms of the dilatational and transformational strain energy, the Gibbs free energy change, the external mechanical work as well as the internal frictional resistance. To test the model, new alloys were developed by tailoring two base alloys, Ti–6Al–4V and Ti–6Al–7Nb, with the addition of β-stabilising element Mo. The alloys exhibited versatile mechanical behaviours with enhanced plasticity. Martensitic nucleation and growth was fundamentally dominated by the competition between elastic strain energy and chemical driving force, where the latter term tends to lower the transformational energy barrier. The model incorporates thermodynamics and micromechanics to quantitatively investigate the threshold energy for operating transformation-induced plasticity and further guides alloy design.
KW - Alloy design
KW - Phase transformation
KW - Physical modelling
KW - Plasticity
KW - Ti alloys
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105285103&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85105285103&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.msea.2021.141229
DO - 10.1016/j.msea.2021.141229
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85105285103
SN - 0921-5093
VL - 815
JO - Materials Science & Engineering A: Structural Materials: Properties, Microstructure and Processing
JF - Materials Science & Engineering A: Structural Materials: Properties, Microstructure and Processing
M1 - 141229
ER -