TY - CHAP
T1 - American international banking in asia
T2 - The case of ibc in china
AU - Sugawara, Ayumu
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was financially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research(C)16K03766, 16KK0049, and (C)19K01774.
Publisher Copyright:
© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2020.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - The purpose of this chapter is to explore the nature of the business conducted by the branches of an American international bank, the International Banking Corporation (hereafter IBC). Although IBC had the largest foreign branch network among the US banks before World War I and it mainly focused on Asia, it was the latest entrant among major international banks in the East. The literature on American international banking before World War I clarified why expansion of foreign branch networks was restricted by their institutional background. However, it does not clarify the branch level activities of the US international banks due to limited access to archival materials. Therefore, even though only partially, we try to fill the gap based on newly explored archival sources. Consequently, we clarify the roles of four branches of IBC within its branch network: London Branch was the key for acceptance; Beijing Branch supplied funds to Shanghai Branch; Tianjin Branch focused on foreign trade finance; and Guangzhou Branch conducting both exchange transactions and fund supplies to Hong Kong Branch. However, competing with other banks, especially with British ones, IBC lagged because it had a similar business model to them and it was also a latecomer.
AB - The purpose of this chapter is to explore the nature of the business conducted by the branches of an American international bank, the International Banking Corporation (hereafter IBC). Although IBC had the largest foreign branch network among the US banks before World War I and it mainly focused on Asia, it was the latest entrant among major international banks in the East. The literature on American international banking before World War I clarified why expansion of foreign branch networks was restricted by their institutional background. However, it does not clarify the branch level activities of the US international banks due to limited access to archival materials. Therefore, even though only partially, we try to fill the gap based on newly explored archival sources. Consequently, we clarify the roles of four branches of IBC within its branch network: London Branch was the key for acceptance; Beijing Branch supplied funds to Shanghai Branch; Tianjin Branch focused on foreign trade finance; and Guangzhou Branch conducting both exchange transactions and fund supplies to Hong Kong Branch. However, competing with other banks, especially with British ones, IBC lagged because it had a similar business model to them and it was also a latecomer.
KW - American international banking
KW - Asia
KW - Branch banking
KW - China
KW - Trade finance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090882740&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85090882740&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-4-431-55615-2_10
DO - 10.1007/978-4-431-55615-2_10
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85090882740
T3 - Studies in Economic History
SP - 251
EP - 284
BT - Studies in Economic History
PB - Springer
ER -