TY - JOUR
T1 - Ankle–foot orthosis with dorsiflexion resistance using spring-cam mechanism increases knee flexion in the swing phase during walking in stroke patients with hemiplegia
AU - Sekiguchi, Yusuke
AU - Owaki, Dai
AU - Honda, Keita
AU - Fukushi, Kenichiro
AU - Hiroi, Noriyoshi
AU - Nozaki, Takeo
AU - Izumi, Shin ichi
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by NEC Corporation, a Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas“Understanding Brain Plasticity on Body Representations to Promote their Adaptive Functions” ( 26120007 and 26120008 ), and Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI grant number 15K16390 . The role of NEC Corporation was assistance with the data collection.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2020/9
Y1 - 2020/9
N2 - Background: Ankle–foot orthoses with plantarflexion resistance (AFO-Ps) improve knee flexion in the stance phase on the paretic side in patients with hemiparesis. However, AFO-Ps decrease ankle power generation in the late stance phase and do not improve the knee flexion in the swing phase based on insufficient push-off at the late stance, resulting in lower toe clearance. Research question: This study sought to investigate the effect of an AFO with dorsiflexion resistance, which was implemented by our developed device with spring–cam mechanism attached to the AFO-P (Gait Solution; Pacific Supply Co., Ltd., Japan), on kinetics and kinematics in the lower limb during gait in patients with hemiparesis. Methods: Eleven patients with hemiparesis due to stroke walked on a 7-m walkway at a self-selected comfortable pace in the following conditions: (a) walking using the AFO-P with the proposed device with a spring–cam mechanism (AFO-PCAM), (b) walking using the AFO-P without our device (AFO-P), and (c) walking using no device (barefoot condition). Gait kinematics and kinetics were collected using a three-dimensional motion analysis system and four ground-reaction force plates. Changes in all parameters from the barefoot to AFO-PCAM and AFO-P conditions were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: In the AFO-PCAM condition, decrease in the maximum ankle power generation in the late-stance phase was significantly smaller than that in the AFO-P condition (p = 0.041). We noted a significant higher change in knee flexion in the paretic swing phase in the AFO-PCAM condition relative to that in the AFO-P condition (p = 0.016). The effect size for the comparisons of change was large (r ≧ 0.5). Significance: Our device facilitated the realization of the ankle plantarflexion power in the late-stance phase because of dorsiflexion resistance, increasing the knee flexion angle during the swing phase.
AB - Background: Ankle–foot orthoses with plantarflexion resistance (AFO-Ps) improve knee flexion in the stance phase on the paretic side in patients with hemiparesis. However, AFO-Ps decrease ankle power generation in the late stance phase and do not improve the knee flexion in the swing phase based on insufficient push-off at the late stance, resulting in lower toe clearance. Research question: This study sought to investigate the effect of an AFO with dorsiflexion resistance, which was implemented by our developed device with spring–cam mechanism attached to the AFO-P (Gait Solution; Pacific Supply Co., Ltd., Japan), on kinetics and kinematics in the lower limb during gait in patients with hemiparesis. Methods: Eleven patients with hemiparesis due to stroke walked on a 7-m walkway at a self-selected comfortable pace in the following conditions: (a) walking using the AFO-P with the proposed device with a spring–cam mechanism (AFO-PCAM), (b) walking using the AFO-P without our device (AFO-P), and (c) walking using no device (barefoot condition). Gait kinematics and kinetics were collected using a three-dimensional motion analysis system and four ground-reaction force plates. Changes in all parameters from the barefoot to AFO-PCAM and AFO-P conditions were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: In the AFO-PCAM condition, decrease in the maximum ankle power generation in the late-stance phase was significantly smaller than that in the AFO-P condition (p = 0.041). We noted a significant higher change in knee flexion in the paretic swing phase in the AFO-PCAM condition relative to that in the AFO-P condition (p = 0.016). The effect size for the comparisons of change was large (r ≧ 0.5). Significance: Our device facilitated the realization of the ankle plantarflexion power in the late-stance phase because of dorsiflexion resistance, increasing the knee flexion angle during the swing phase.
KW - Ankle–foot orthoses
KW - Gait
KW - Knee flexion
KW - Stroke
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087503153&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85087503153&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.06.029
DO - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.06.029
M3 - Article
C2 - 32652487
AN - SCOPUS:85087503153
SN - 0966-6362
VL - 81
SP - 27
EP - 32
JO - Gait and Posture
JF - Gait and Posture
ER -