Assessing the generality of global leaf trait relationships

Ian J. Wright, Peter B. Reich, Johannes H.C. Cornelissen, Daniel S. Falster, Eric Garnier, Kouki Hikosaka, Byron B. Lamont, William Lee, Jacek Oleksyn, Noriyuki Osada, Hendrik Poorter, Rafael Villar, David I. Warton, Mark Westoby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

620 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

• Global-scale quantification of relationships between plant traits gives insight into the evolution of the world's vegetation, and is crucial for parameterizing vegetation-climate models. • A database was compiled, comprising data for hundreds to thousands of species for the core 'leaf economics' traits leaf lifespan, leaf mass per area, photosynthetic capacity, dark respiration, and leaf nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations, as well as leaf potassium, photosynthetic N-use efficiency (PNUE), and leaf N:P ratio. • While mean trait values differed between plant functional types, the range found within groups was often larger than differences among them. Future vegetation-climate models could incorporate this knowledge. • The core leaf traits were intercorrelated, both globally and within plant functional types, forming a 'leaf economics spectrum'. While these relationships are very general, they are not universal, as significant heterogeneity exists between relationships fitted to individual sites. Much, but not all, heterogeneity can be explained by variation in sample size alone. PNUE can also be considered as part of this trait spectrum, whereas leaf K and N:P ratios are only loosely related.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)485-496
Number of pages12
JournalNew Phytologist
Volume166
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005 May

Keywords

  • Leaf economics
  • Nutrient stoichiometry
  • Photosynthesis
  • Plant functional types
  • Respiration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Plant Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing the generality of global leaf trait relationships'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this