TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of inter-expert variability and of an automated segmentation method of 40 and 60 MHz IVUS images of coronary arteries
AU - Destrempes, François
AU - Roy Cardinal, Marie Hélène
AU - Saijo, Yoshifumi
AU - Finet, Gérard
AU - Tardif, Jean Claude
AU - Cloutier, Guy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Destrempes et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2017/1
Y1 - 2017/1
N2 - The objectives were to compare the performance of a segmentation algorithm, based on the minimization of an uncertainty function, to delineate contours of external elastic membrane and lumen of human coronary arteries imaged with 40 and 60 MHz IVUS, and to use values of this function to delineate portions of contours with highest uncertainty. For 8 patients, 40 and 60 MHz IVUS coronary data acquired pre- and post-interventions were used, for a total of 68,516 images. Manual segmentations of contours (on 2312 images) performed by experts at three core laboratories were the gold-standards. Inter-expert variability was highest on contour points with largest values of the uncertainty function (p < 0.001). Inter-expert variability was lower at 60 than 40 MHz for external elastic membrane (p = 0.013) and lumen (p = 0.024). Average differences in plaque (and atheroma) burden between algorithmic contours and experts' contours were within inter-expert variability (p < 0.001).
AB - The objectives were to compare the performance of a segmentation algorithm, based on the minimization of an uncertainty function, to delineate contours of external elastic membrane and lumen of human coronary arteries imaged with 40 and 60 MHz IVUS, and to use values of this function to delineate portions of contours with highest uncertainty. For 8 patients, 40 and 60 MHz IVUS coronary data acquired pre- and post-interventions were used, for a total of 68,516 images. Manual segmentations of contours (on 2312 images) performed by experts at three core laboratories were the gold-standards. Inter-expert variability was highest on contour points with largest values of the uncertainty function (p < 0.001). Inter-expert variability was lower at 60 than 40 MHz for external elastic membrane (p = 0.013) and lumen (p = 0.024). Average differences in plaque (and atheroma) burden between algorithmic contours and experts' contours were within inter-expert variability (p < 0.001).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010300576&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85010300576&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0168332
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0168332
M3 - Article
C2 - 28107355
AN - SCOPUS:85010300576
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 12
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 1
M1 - e0168332
ER -