TY - JOUR
T1 - Auditory evoked magnetic fields in patients with absent brainstem responses due to auditory neuropathy with optic atrophy
AU - Takata, Yusuke
AU - Kawase, Tetsuaki
AU - Nakasato, Nobukazu
AU - Kanno, Akitake
AU - Kobayashi, Toshimitsu
N1 - Funding Information:
We wish to thank the staff of Kohnan Hospital Ryogo Center for their continuous support of this work. This study was supported by a Grant from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology – Japan (Grant-in-Aid for Exploratory Research 15659401 ).
PY - 2012/5
Y1 - 2012/5
N2 - Objective: To examine whether auditory evoked fields (AEFs) can be used to objectively evaluate hearing in patients with absent auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) due to auditory neuropathy. Methods: Subjects were 3 patients with auditory neuropathy, 1 male aged 29. years and 2 females aged 18 and 27. years, with absence of click evoked ABRs for bilateral ear stimuli at a level of 105. dB nHL. All patients also had optic atrophy. AEFs were measured with a helmet-shaped magnetoencephalography system for 2.0. kHz tone bursts of 60. ms duration to the unilateral ear. Results: Bihemispherical AEF responses were clearly recorded in all three patients for either left or right ear stimulus. Although the latencies of N100m were severely prolonged and amplitudes were considerably decreased compared to the normal range of N100m responses in our facilities, N100m latency of AEF was shorter in the contralateral hemisphere to the stimulated ear, as usually found in normal subjects, despite the abnormal delay in N100m latency in all conditions. Conclusions: Presence and abnormality of auditory cortical responses can be evaluated by AEFs in patients with auditory neuropathy even under null responses in ABRs. Significance: AEFs are useful to evaluate residual hearing in patients with auditory neuropathy.
AB - Objective: To examine whether auditory evoked fields (AEFs) can be used to objectively evaluate hearing in patients with absent auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) due to auditory neuropathy. Methods: Subjects were 3 patients with auditory neuropathy, 1 male aged 29. years and 2 females aged 18 and 27. years, with absence of click evoked ABRs for bilateral ear stimuli at a level of 105. dB nHL. All patients also had optic atrophy. AEFs were measured with a helmet-shaped magnetoencephalography system for 2.0. kHz tone bursts of 60. ms duration to the unilateral ear. Results: Bihemispherical AEF responses were clearly recorded in all three patients for either left or right ear stimulus. Although the latencies of N100m were severely prolonged and amplitudes were considerably decreased compared to the normal range of N100m responses in our facilities, N100m latency of AEF was shorter in the contralateral hemisphere to the stimulated ear, as usually found in normal subjects, despite the abnormal delay in N100m latency in all conditions. Conclusions: Presence and abnormality of auditory cortical responses can be evaluated by AEFs in patients with auditory neuropathy even under null responses in ABRs. Significance: AEFs are useful to evaluate residual hearing in patients with auditory neuropathy.
KW - Auditory evoked field
KW - Auditory neuropathy
KW - Magnetoencephalography
KW - N100m
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858746846&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858746846&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.10.044
DO - 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.10.044
M3 - Article
C2 - 22119798
AN - SCOPUS:84858746846
SN - 1388-2457
VL - 123
SP - 985
EP - 992
JO - Clinical Neurophysiology
JF - Clinical Neurophysiology
IS - 5
ER -