Biomechanical and histological evaluation of the osseointegration capacity of two types of zirconia implant

Jian Min Han, Guang Hong, Hong Lin, Yoshinaka Shimizu, Yuhan Wu, Gang Zheng, Hongyu Zhang, Keiichi Sasaki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)


The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical and histological behavior of a ceria-stabilized zirconia–alumina nanocomposite (NanoZr) in comparison with that of 3 mol% yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystalline (3Y-TZP) in Sprague Dawley rats. Cylindrical NanoZr and 3Y-TZP implants (diameter 1 mm, length 2 mm) were used. Implant-surface morphology and surface roughness were determined by scanning white-light interferometry and scanning electron microscopy, respectively. The cylindrical zirconia implants were placed at the distal edge of the femur of Sprague Dawley rats. At weeks 2, 4, and 8, the interfacial shear strength between implant and bone was measured by push-in test. Histological analysis was performed using hard-tissue sections. Bone–implant contact (BIC), the thickness of new bone around the implant within the bone marrow area, and osteoclast numbers were evaluated. The average surface roughness of 3Y-TZP (Sa 0.788 μm) was significantly higher than that of NanoZr (Sa 0.559 μm). The shear strengths of 3Y-TZP and NanoZr were similar at 2 weeks, but at 4 and 8 weeks the shear strength of NanoZr was higher than that of 3Y-TZP. The average BIC values within the bone marrow area for 3Y-TZP and NanoZr were 25.26% and 31.51% at 2 weeks, 46.78% and 38% at 4 weeks, and 47.88% and 56.81% at 8 weeks, respectively. The average BIC values within the cortical area were 38.86% and 58.42% at 2 weeks, 66.82% and 57.74% at 4 weeks, and 79.91% and 78.97% at 8 weeks, respectively. The mean BIC value did not differ significantly between the two zirconia materials at any time point. The NanoZr implants were biocompatible, capable of establishing close BIC, and may be preferred for metal-free dental implants.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6507-6516
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Nanomedicine
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Dec 7


  • Dental implant
  • Histomorphometry
  • Push-in test
  • Zirconia
  • Zirconia–alumina nanocomposite


Dive into the research topics of 'Biomechanical and histological evaluation of the osseointegration capacity of two types of zirconia implant'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this