TY - JOUR
T1 - Budget impact analysis of treatment flow optimization in epilepsy patients
T2 - Estimating potential impacts with increased referral rate to specialized care
AU - Iwasaki, Masaki
AU - Saito, Takashi
AU - Tsubota, Akiko
AU - Murata, Tatsunori
AU - Fukuoka, Yuta
AU - Jin, Kazutaka
N1 - Funding Information:
Disclosure: This study was sponsored by LivaNova PLC, Tokyo, Japan. Akiko Tsubota is an employee of LivaNova PLC. Tatsunori Murata is an employee of CRECON Medical Assessment Inc.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Columbia Data Analytics. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Objectives: We developed a Markov model to simulate a treatment flow of epilepsy patients who refer to specialized care from non-specialized care, and to surgery from specialized care for estimation of patient distributions and expenditures caused by increasing the referral rate for specialized care. Methods: This budget impact analysis of treatment flow optimization in epilepsy patients was performed as a long-term simulation using the Markov model by comparing the current treatment flow and the optimized treatment flow. In the model, we simulated the prognosis of new onset 5-yearold epilepsy patients (assuming to represent epilepsy occurring between 0 and 10 years of age) treated over a lifetime period. Direct costs of pharmacotherapies, management fees and surgeries are included in the analysis to evaluate the annual budget impact in Japan. Results: In the current treatment flow, the number of refractory patients treated with four drugs by non-specialized care were estimated as 8766 and yielded JPY5.8 billion annually. However, in the optimized treatment flow, the number of patients treated with four drugs by non-specialized care significantly decreased and who continued the monotherapy increased. The costs for the four-drug therapy by non-specialized care were eliminated. Hence cost-saving of JPY9.5 billion (-5% of the current treatment flow) in total national expenditures would be expected. Conclusion: This study highlights that any policy decision-making for referral optimization to specialized care in appropriate epilepsy patients would be feasible with a cost-savings or very few budget impacts. However, important information in the decision-making such as transition probability to the next therapy or excuse for sensitive limitations is not available currently. Therefore, further research with reliable data such as big data analysis or a national survey with real-world treatment patterns is needed.
AB - Objectives: We developed a Markov model to simulate a treatment flow of epilepsy patients who refer to specialized care from non-specialized care, and to surgery from specialized care for estimation of patient distributions and expenditures caused by increasing the referral rate for specialized care. Methods: This budget impact analysis of treatment flow optimization in epilepsy patients was performed as a long-term simulation using the Markov model by comparing the current treatment flow and the optimized treatment flow. In the model, we simulated the prognosis of new onset 5-yearold epilepsy patients (assuming to represent epilepsy occurring between 0 and 10 years of age) treated over a lifetime period. Direct costs of pharmacotherapies, management fees and surgeries are included in the analysis to evaluate the annual budget impact in Japan. Results: In the current treatment flow, the number of refractory patients treated with four drugs by non-specialized care were estimated as 8766 and yielded JPY5.8 billion annually. However, in the optimized treatment flow, the number of patients treated with four drugs by non-specialized care significantly decreased and who continued the monotherapy increased. The costs for the four-drug therapy by non-specialized care were eliminated. Hence cost-saving of JPY9.5 billion (-5% of the current treatment flow) in total national expenditures would be expected. Conclusion: This study highlights that any policy decision-making for referral optimization to specialized care in appropriate epilepsy patients would be feasible with a cost-savings or very few budget impacts. However, important information in the decision-making such as transition probability to the next therapy or excuse for sensitive limitations is not available currently. Therefore, further research with reliable data such as big data analysis or a national survey with real-world treatment patterns is needed.
KW - Budget impact
KW - Epilepsy
KW - Markov model
KW - Referral rate
KW - Treatment flow optimization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85109434346&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85109434346&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.36469/24061
DO - 10.36469/24061
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85109434346
SN - 2327-2236
VL - 8
SP - 80
EP - 87
JO - Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
JF - Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
IS - 1
ER -