TY - JOUR
T1 - Calculation of approximate heart rate variability indicators based on low-resolution heart rate data provided by widely used commercially available wearable devices
AU - Li, Xue
AU - Onoguchi, Goh
AU - Komatsu, Hiroshi
AU - Ono, Chiaki
AU - Warita, Noriko
AU - Yu, Zhiqian
AU - Nagaoka, Atsuko
AU - Horikoshi, Sho
AU - Iwabuchi, Kenji
AU - Fuji, Kohei
AU - Hino, Mizuki
AU - Takahashi, Yuta
AU - Ohseto, Hisashi
AU - Kobayashi, Natsuko
AU - Kikuchi, Saya
AU - Kunii, Yasuto
AU - Obara, Taku
AU - Kuriyama, Shinichi
AU - Homma, Noriyasu
AU - Nachev, Parashkev
AU - Ito, Akinori
AU - Tomita, Hiroaki
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025
PY - 2026/2
Y1 - 2026/2
N2 - Heart rate variability (HRV) assessment using wearable technology is a valuable tool for monitoring physical and emotional health. However, many widely used wearable devices, such as those from Apple and Fitbit, do not provide high-resolution heart rate (HR) data (i.e., data for every heartbeat) but instead report low-resolution data, typically as average HR values over fixed intervals (e.g., every 5 s). In this study, we developed algorithms to estimate HRV indicators from such low-resolution HR data and evaluated their reliability and accuracy. High-resolution HR data were collected over one week from 154 pregnant women (aged 25–44 years, 23–32 weeks gestation) using a chest-worn portable HR monitor. The average HR over each 5-second interval was calculated to match Fitbit's data format. HRV indicators were computed from the reconstructed low-resolution data and compared with those from the original high-resolution data using two one-sided tests of equivalence (TOST), correlation analysis, and principal component analysis (PCA). Additional validation using Bland–Altman plots and bootstrap-derived confidence intervals assessed estimation stability. All analyses indicated high similarity between estimated and reference HRV values. TOST confirmed statistical equivalence (p < 0.05) with negligible effect sizes (Cohen's d < 0.1). Correlation coefficients ranged from 0.714 to 0.921, and PCA yielded a similarity index of 0.95. The algorithms demonstrated robustness through equivalence testing, distributional similarity, error stability, and cross-cohort generalizability. Further validation using both high- and low-resolution HR datasets from publicly available databases supported these findings. These results suggest that HRV indicators derived from low-resolution HR data may be sufficiently accurate for clinical and everyday health monitoring.
AB - Heart rate variability (HRV) assessment using wearable technology is a valuable tool for monitoring physical and emotional health. However, many widely used wearable devices, such as those from Apple and Fitbit, do not provide high-resolution heart rate (HR) data (i.e., data for every heartbeat) but instead report low-resolution data, typically as average HR values over fixed intervals (e.g., every 5 s). In this study, we developed algorithms to estimate HRV indicators from such low-resolution HR data and evaluated their reliability and accuracy. High-resolution HR data were collected over one week from 154 pregnant women (aged 25–44 years, 23–32 weeks gestation) using a chest-worn portable HR monitor. The average HR over each 5-second interval was calculated to match Fitbit's data format. HRV indicators were computed from the reconstructed low-resolution data and compared with those from the original high-resolution data using two one-sided tests of equivalence (TOST), correlation analysis, and principal component analysis (PCA). Additional validation using Bland–Altman plots and bootstrap-derived confidence intervals assessed estimation stability. All analyses indicated high similarity between estimated and reference HRV values. TOST confirmed statistical equivalence (p < 0.05) with negligible effect sizes (Cohen's d < 0.1). Correlation coefficients ranged from 0.714 to 0.921, and PCA yielded a similarity index of 0.95. The algorithms demonstrated robustness through equivalence testing, distributional similarity, error stability, and cross-cohort generalizability. Further validation using both high- and low-resolution HR datasets from publicly available databases supported these findings. These results suggest that HRV indicators derived from low-resolution HR data may be sufficiently accurate for clinical and everyday health monitoring.
KW - Algorithm
KW - heart rate monitor
KW - heart rate variability
KW - similarity assessment
KW - wearable device
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105015376903
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105015376903#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/j.bspc.2025.108579
DO - 10.1016/j.bspc.2025.108579
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105015376903
SN - 1746-8094
VL - 112
JO - Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
JF - Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
M1 - 108579
ER -