TY - JOUR
T1 - Characteristics of Tsunami Fragility Functions Developed Using Different Sources of Damage Data from the 2018 Sulawesi Earthquake and Tsunami
AU - Mas, Erick
AU - Paulik, Ryan
AU - Pakoksung, Kwanchai
AU - Adriano, Bruno
AU - Moya, Luis
AU - Suppasri, Anawat
AU - Muhari, Abdul
AU - Khomarudin, Rokhis
AU - Yokoya, Naoto
AU - Matsuoka, Masashi
AU - Koshimura, Shunichi
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was partly funded by the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) J-Rapid project number JPMJJR1803; the JST CREST project number JP-MJCR1411; the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Kakenhi Programs (17H06108, 17H02050, and 17H01293); the Core Research Cluster of Disaster Science at Tohoku University, Japan (a Designated National University); the MEXT Next Generation High-Performance Computing Infrastructures and Applications R&D Program; and the National Fund for Scientific, Technological and Technological Innovation Development (Fondecyt - Peru) [contract number 038-2019]. The collaboration of Suppasri, A. and Pakoksung, K. was supported by Tokio Marine & Nichido Fire Insurance Co., Ltd.; Willis Research Network (WRN); Pacific Consultants Co., Ltd.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s).
PY - 2020/6/1
Y1 - 2020/6/1
N2 - We developed tsunami fragility functions using three sources of damage data from the 2018 Sulawesi tsunami at Palu Bay in Indonesia obtained from (i) field survey data (FS), (ii) a visual interpretation of optical satellite images (VI), and (iii) a machine learning and remote sensing approach utilized on multisensor and multitemporal satellite images (MLRS). Tsunami fragility functions are cumulative distribution functions that express the probability of a structure reaching or exceeding a particular damage state in response to a specific tsunami intensity measure, in this case obtained from the interpolation of multiple surveyed points of tsunami flow depth. We observed that the FS approach led to a more consistent function than that of the VI and MLRS methods. In particular, an initial damage probability observed at zero inundation depth in the latter two methods revealed the effects of misclassifications on tsunami fragility functions derived from VI data; however, it also highlighted the remarkable advantages of MLRS methods. The reasons and insights used to overcome such limitations are discussed together with the pros and cons of each method. The results show that the tsunami damage observed in the 2018 Sulawesi event in Indonesia, expressed in the fragility function developed herein, is similar in shape to the function developed after the 1993 Hokkaido Nansei-oki tsunami, albeit with a slightly lower damage probability between zero-to-five-meter inundation depths. On the other hand, in comparison with the fragility function developed after the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami in Banda Aceh, the characteristics of Palu structures exhibit higher fragility in response to tsunamis. The two-meter inundation depth exhibited nearly 20% probability of damage in the case of Banda Aceh, while the probability of damage was close to 70% at the same depth in Palu.
AB - We developed tsunami fragility functions using three sources of damage data from the 2018 Sulawesi tsunami at Palu Bay in Indonesia obtained from (i) field survey data (FS), (ii) a visual interpretation of optical satellite images (VI), and (iii) a machine learning and remote sensing approach utilized on multisensor and multitemporal satellite images (MLRS). Tsunami fragility functions are cumulative distribution functions that express the probability of a structure reaching or exceeding a particular damage state in response to a specific tsunami intensity measure, in this case obtained from the interpolation of multiple surveyed points of tsunami flow depth. We observed that the FS approach led to a more consistent function than that of the VI and MLRS methods. In particular, an initial damage probability observed at zero inundation depth in the latter two methods revealed the effects of misclassifications on tsunami fragility functions derived from VI data; however, it also highlighted the remarkable advantages of MLRS methods. The reasons and insights used to overcome such limitations are discussed together with the pros and cons of each method. The results show that the tsunami damage observed in the 2018 Sulawesi event in Indonesia, expressed in the fragility function developed herein, is similar in shape to the function developed after the 1993 Hokkaido Nansei-oki tsunami, albeit with a slightly lower damage probability between zero-to-five-meter inundation depths. On the other hand, in comparison with the fragility function developed after the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami in Banda Aceh, the characteristics of Palu structures exhibit higher fragility in response to tsunamis. The two-meter inundation depth exhibited nearly 20% probability of damage in the case of Banda Aceh, while the probability of damage was close to 70% at the same depth in Palu.
KW - 2018 Sulawesi
KW - Fragility function
KW - earthquake
KW - tsunami
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085939746&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85085939746&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00024-020-02501-4
DO - 10.1007/s00024-020-02501-4
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85085939746
SN - 0033-4553
VL - 177
SP - 2437
EP - 2455
JO - Pure and Applied Geophysics
JF - Pure and Applied Geophysics
IS - 6
ER -