TY - JOUR
T1 - Classification of 3097 patients from the Japanese melanoma study database using the American joint committee on cancer eighth edition cancer staging system
AU - Fujisawa, Yasuhiro
AU - Yoshikawa, Shusuke
AU - Minagawa, Akane
AU - Takenouchi, Tatsuya
AU - Yokota, Kenji
AU - Uchi, Hiroshi
AU - Noma, Naoki
AU - Nakamura, Yasuhiro
AU - Asai, Jun
AU - Kato, Junji
AU - Fujiwara, Susumu
AU - Fukushima, Satoshi
AU - Uehara, Jiro
AU - Hoashi, Toshihiko
AU - Kaji, Tatsuya
AU - Fujimura, Taku
AU - Namikawa, Kenjiro
AU - Yoshioka, Manabu
AU - Murata, Naoki
AU - Ogata, Dai
AU - Matsuyama, Kanako
AU - Hatta, Naohito
AU - Shibayama, Yoshitsugu
AU - Fujiyama, Toshiharu
AU - Ishikawa, Masashi
AU - Yamada, Daisuke
AU - Kishi, Akiko
AU - Nakamura, Yoshiyuki
AU - Shimiauchi, Takatoshi
AU - Fujii, Kazuyasu
AU - Fujimoto, Manabu
AU - Ihn, Hironobu
AU - Katoh, Norito
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by Japan Skin Cancer Society .
Funding Information:
This research was supported by Japan Skin Cancer Society. We would like to thank all the participants in 668 institutes collaborated this survey. Also, would like to thank Thomas Mayers of the Medical English Communication Center of the University of Tsukuba, for his excellent English revisions.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Japanese Society for Investigative Dermatology
PY - 2019/5
Y1 - 2019/5
N2 - Background: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th Edition Cancer Staging System was implemented in 2018; however, it has not been validated in an Asian melanoma population. Objective: The purpose of this study was to validate the new system using a cohort of Japanese melanoma patients. Methods: The AJCC 7th and 8th Editions were used for TNM classification of patients in a database established by the Japanese Melanoma Study Group. Patient data with sufficient information to be applicable to the AJCC 8th staging were selected. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate disease-specific survival and relapse-free survival. Results: In total, data for 3097 patients were analyzed. The 5-year disease-specific survival according to the 7th and 8th Edition staging system were as follows: IA = 98.5%/97.9%; IB = 95.4%/96.2%; IIA = 94.2%/94.1%; IIB = 84.6%/84.4%; IIC = 72.2%/72.2%; IIIA = 76.2%/87.5%; IIIB = 60.7%/72.6%; IIIC = 42.0%/55.3% and IIID = none/26.0%. The 5-year relapse-free survival according to the 7th and 8th Edition staging was as follows: IA = 94.5%/92.7%; IB = 85.4%/85.3%; IIA = 80.1%/79.4%; IIB = 71.4%/70.6%; IIC = 56.8%/55.7%; IIIA = 56.8%/69.4%; IIIB = 42.6%/56.8%; IIIC = 20.0%/33.3% and IIID = none/6.5%. Conclusion: The results show that new staging system could efficiently classify our Japanese melanoma cohort. Although there was no difference in Stage I and II disease between the 7th and 8th Edition systems, we should be careful in managing Stage III disease since the survival curves of the 8th Edition staging were completely different from the 7th Edition. Moreover, our results indicate that adjuvant therapies for Stage IIB and IIC should be developed, since the relapse-free survival for these stages were equivalent to Stage IIIA and IIIB, respectively.
AB - Background: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th Edition Cancer Staging System was implemented in 2018; however, it has not been validated in an Asian melanoma population. Objective: The purpose of this study was to validate the new system using a cohort of Japanese melanoma patients. Methods: The AJCC 7th and 8th Editions were used for TNM classification of patients in a database established by the Japanese Melanoma Study Group. Patient data with sufficient information to be applicable to the AJCC 8th staging were selected. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate disease-specific survival and relapse-free survival. Results: In total, data for 3097 patients were analyzed. The 5-year disease-specific survival according to the 7th and 8th Edition staging system were as follows: IA = 98.5%/97.9%; IB = 95.4%/96.2%; IIA = 94.2%/94.1%; IIB = 84.6%/84.4%; IIC = 72.2%/72.2%; IIIA = 76.2%/87.5%; IIIB = 60.7%/72.6%; IIIC = 42.0%/55.3% and IIID = none/26.0%. The 5-year relapse-free survival according to the 7th and 8th Edition staging was as follows: IA = 94.5%/92.7%; IB = 85.4%/85.3%; IIA = 80.1%/79.4%; IIB = 71.4%/70.6%; IIC = 56.8%/55.7%; IIIA = 56.8%/69.4%; IIIB = 42.6%/56.8%; IIIC = 20.0%/33.3% and IIID = none/6.5%. Conclusion: The results show that new staging system could efficiently classify our Japanese melanoma cohort. Although there was no difference in Stage I and II disease between the 7th and 8th Edition systems, we should be careful in managing Stage III disease since the survival curves of the 8th Edition staging were completely different from the 7th Edition. Moreover, our results indicate that adjuvant therapies for Stage IIB and IIC should be developed, since the relapse-free survival for these stages were equivalent to Stage IIIA and IIIB, respectively.
KW - Epidemiology
KW - Melanoma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064573692&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064573692&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2019.04.003
DO - 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2019.04.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 31023613
AN - SCOPUS:85064573692
SN - 0923-1811
VL - 94
SP - 284
EP - 289
JO - Journal of Dermatological Science
JF - Journal of Dermatological Science
IS - 2
ER -