TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical course of masticatory function recovery following arthrocentesis in patients with unilateral mandibular condyle head fracture
AU - Nogami, Shinnosuke
AU - Yamauchi, Kensuke
AU - Izumita, Kuniyuki
AU - Kitamura, Jun
AU - Takeda, Yuri
AU - Otake, Yoshio
AU - Koyama, Shinki
AU - Okuyama, Kyosuke
AU - Sasaki, Keiichi
AU - Takahashi, Tetsu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical course of masticatory function recovery following arthrocentesis. Patients with a unilateral condylar head fracture who underwent arthrocentesis for therapeutic reasons were evaluated and compared with patients with a unilateral condylar head fracture who did not undergo arthrocentesis. At 3 months after treatment, the occlusal contact area and maximum bite force in patients with a fracture treated with arthrocentesis were greater than in those who did not receive arthrocentesis at the same time points, although the differences were not significant. Moreover, at 1 and 3 months following arthrocentesis, mean (±SD) occlusal contact area (1 month: 1.99 ± 0.55 mm2, p = 0.01; 3 months: 2.90 ± 1.36 mm2, p = 0.03) and maximum bite force (1 month: 82.45 ± 15.04 N, p = 0.01; 3 months: 101.11 ± 14.53 N, p = 0.01) on the fractured side in patients who underwent that treatment were significantly reduced when compared with those on the non-fractured side. The authors conclude that if the priority is to avoid open reduction and internal fixation, then the arthrocentesis approach might be a less invasive alternative, albeit with the price of a prolonged healing interval.
AB - The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical course of masticatory function recovery following arthrocentesis. Patients with a unilateral condylar head fracture who underwent arthrocentesis for therapeutic reasons were evaluated and compared with patients with a unilateral condylar head fracture who did not undergo arthrocentesis. At 3 months after treatment, the occlusal contact area and maximum bite force in patients with a fracture treated with arthrocentesis were greater than in those who did not receive arthrocentesis at the same time points, although the differences were not significant. Moreover, at 1 and 3 months following arthrocentesis, mean (±SD) occlusal contact area (1 month: 1.99 ± 0.55 mm2, p = 0.01; 3 months: 2.90 ± 1.36 mm2, p = 0.03) and maximum bite force (1 month: 82.45 ± 15.04 N, p = 0.01; 3 months: 101.11 ± 14.53 N, p = 0.01) on the fractured side in patients who underwent that treatment were significantly reduced when compared with those on the non-fractured side. The authors conclude that if the priority is to avoid open reduction and internal fixation, then the arthrocentesis approach might be a less invasive alternative, albeit with the price of a prolonged healing interval.
KW - Arthrocentesis
KW - Mandibular condyle head fracture
KW - Masticatory function
KW - Maximum bite force
KW - Occlusal contact area
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121351366&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85121351366&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.12.005
DO - 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.12.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 34930666
AN - SCOPUS:85121351366
SN - 1010-5182
VL - 50
SP - 225
EP - 229
JO - Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery
JF - Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery
IS - 3
ER -