TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical impact of dosimetric changes for volumetric modulated arc therapy in log file-based patient dose calculations
AU - Katsuta, Yoshiyuki
AU - Kadoya, Noriyuki
AU - Fujita, Yukio
AU - Shimizu, Eiji
AU - Matsunaga, Kenichi
AU - Matsushita, Haruo
AU - Majima, Kazuhiro
AU - Jingu, Keiichi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica
PY - 2017/10
Y1 - 2017/10
N2 - Purpose A log file-based method cannot detect dosimetric changes due to linac component miscalibration because log files are insensitive to miscalibration. Herein, clinical impacts of dosimetric changes on a log file-based method were determined. Methods and materials Five head-and-neck and five prostate plans were applied. Miscalibration-simulated log files were generated by inducing a linac component miscalibration into the log file. Miscalibration magnitudes for leaf, gantry, and collimator at the general tolerance level were ±0.5 mm, ±1°, and ±1°, respectively, and at a tighter tolerance level achievable on current linac were ±0.3 mm, ±0.5°, and ±0.5°, respectively. Re-calculations were performed on patient anatomy using log file data. Results Changes in tumor control probability/normal tissue complication probability from treatment planning system dose to re-calculated dose at the general tolerance level was 1.8% on planning target volume (PTV) and 2.4% on organs at risk (OARs) in both plans. These changes at the tighter tolerance level were improved to 1.0% on PTV and to 1.5% on OARs, with a statistically significant difference. Conclusions We determined the clinical impacts of dosimetric changes on a log file-based method using a general tolerance level and a tighter tolerance level for linac miscalibration and found that a tighter tolerance level significantly improved the accuracy of the log file-based method.
AB - Purpose A log file-based method cannot detect dosimetric changes due to linac component miscalibration because log files are insensitive to miscalibration. Herein, clinical impacts of dosimetric changes on a log file-based method were determined. Methods and materials Five head-and-neck and five prostate plans were applied. Miscalibration-simulated log files were generated by inducing a linac component miscalibration into the log file. Miscalibration magnitudes for leaf, gantry, and collimator at the general tolerance level were ±0.5 mm, ±1°, and ±1°, respectively, and at a tighter tolerance level achievable on current linac were ±0.3 mm, ±0.5°, and ±0.5°, respectively. Re-calculations were performed on patient anatomy using log file data. Results Changes in tumor control probability/normal tissue complication probability from treatment planning system dose to re-calculated dose at the general tolerance level was 1.8% on planning target volume (PTV) and 2.4% on organs at risk (OARs) in both plans. These changes at the tighter tolerance level were improved to 1.0% on PTV and to 1.5% on OARs, with a statistically significant difference. Conclusions We determined the clinical impacts of dosimetric changes on a log file-based method using a general tolerance level and a tighter tolerance level for linac miscalibration and found that a tighter tolerance level significantly improved the accuracy of the log file-based method.
KW - Log file
KW - Patient-specific quality assurance
KW - Radiotherapy
KW - Volumetric modulated arc therapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035120128&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85035120128&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.08.004
DO - 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.08.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 29173901
AN - SCOPUS:85035120128
SN - 1120-1797
VL - 42
SP - 1
EP - 6
JO - Physica Medica
JF - Physica Medica
ER -