TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical outcome of elderly patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine plus S-1, S-1 alone, or gemcitabine alone
T2 - Subgroup analysis of a randomised phase III trial, GEST study.
AU - Imaoka, Hiroshi
AU - Kou, Tadayuki
AU - Tanaka, Masao
AU - Egawa, Shinichi
AU - Mizuno, Nobumasa
AU - Hijioka, Susumu
AU - Hara, Kazuo
AU - Yazumi, Shujiro
AU - Shimizu, Yasuhiro
AU - Yamao, Kenji
N1 - Funding Information:
The GEST study was sponsored by Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. in Japan and by TTY biopharm Co. Ltd. in Taiwan. In this subgroup analysis, Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. had no role in the study design, interpretation, writing the manuscript or decision to submit the paper for publication. Data were analysed by Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. The corresponding author was involved in the study design, interpretation, and writing the manuscript and had full access to the data and final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. All authors had the opportunity to review the analysis plan and outcome, participated in the preparation of this report, and provided final approval.
Funding Information:
N.M. has received research funding from Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. and speaking honoraria from Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. and Elli Lilly Japan K.K.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/2/1
Y1 - 2016/2/1
N2 - Background In the GEST study of unresectable pancreatic cancer, S-1 demonstrated non-inferiority compared to gemcitabine, but gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) did not show superiority over gemcitabine for overall survival (OS). We performed subgroup analysis of these data focused on the efficacy and safety of these regimens as a first-line treatment for elderly patients. Methods Elderly patients (≥70 years, n = 261) treated for unresectable pancreatic cancer (GS: n = 90, S-1: n = 85 and gemcitabine: n = 86) were analysed. Results No significant differences between the GS, S-1, or gemcitabine groups in OS (median: 10.2, 8.0 and 8.5 months, respectively) or objective response rates (27.6%, 25.3% and 14.3%, respectively) were noted. Grade ≥III adverse haematological events were observed more frequently in GS-treated than in S-1- or gemcitabine-treated elderly patients (p < 0.001 and p = 0.016, respectively). Four of 8 patients aged ≥80 years experienced serious adverse events. Conclusions S-1 and gemcitabine are both efficacious options for treatment of elderly patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. Conversely, first-line treatment of elderly patients with GS should only be used after careful consideration.
AB - Background In the GEST study of unresectable pancreatic cancer, S-1 demonstrated non-inferiority compared to gemcitabine, but gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) did not show superiority over gemcitabine for overall survival (OS). We performed subgroup analysis of these data focused on the efficacy and safety of these regimens as a first-line treatment for elderly patients. Methods Elderly patients (≥70 years, n = 261) treated for unresectable pancreatic cancer (GS: n = 90, S-1: n = 85 and gemcitabine: n = 86) were analysed. Results No significant differences between the GS, S-1, or gemcitabine groups in OS (median: 10.2, 8.0 and 8.5 months, respectively) or objective response rates (27.6%, 25.3% and 14.3%, respectively) were noted. Grade ≥III adverse haematological events were observed more frequently in GS-treated than in S-1- or gemcitabine-treated elderly patients (p < 0.001 and p = 0.016, respectively). Four of 8 patients aged ≥80 years experienced serious adverse events. Conclusions S-1 and gemcitabine are both efficacious options for treatment of elderly patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. Conversely, first-line treatment of elderly patients with GS should only be used after careful consideration.
KW - Elderly patients
KW - Gemcitabine
KW - Pancreatic cancer
KW - S-1
KW - Subgroup analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952333113&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84952333113&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.11.002
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.11.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 26741729
AN - SCOPUS:84952333113
SN - 0959-8049
VL - 54
SP - 96
EP - 103
JO - European Journal of Cancer
JF - European Journal of Cancer
ER -