TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical significance of the LacdiNAc-glycosylated prostate-specific antigen assay for prostate cancer detection
AU - Yoneyama, Tohru
AU - Tobisawa, Yuki
AU - Kaneko, Tomonori
AU - Kaya, Takatoshi
AU - Hatakeyama, Shingo
AU - Mori, Kazuyuki
AU - Sutoh Yoneyama, Mihoko
AU - Okubo, Teppei
AU - Mitsuzuka, Koji
AU - Duivenvoorden, Wilhelmina
AU - Pinthus, Jehonathan H.
AU - Hashimoto, Yasuhiro
AU - Ito, Akihiro
AU - Koie, Takuya
AU - Suda, Yoshihiko
AU - Gardiner, Robert A.
AU - Ohyama, Chikara
N1 - Funding Information:
All of the authors thank Katsuko Yamashita, Ph.D., for providing basic information about LDN-PSA and Yukie Nishizawa, Shoko Nagata, Mitsuharu Miyadate, and Satomi Sakamoto, technical assistants at Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, for their invaluable help with sample collection and patient data management. This study was supported by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development-SENTAN KEISOKU BUNSEKIGIJYUTU KAIHATSU program (AMED)-SENTAN project grant no. 16hm0102030 h0002 from AMED and also supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI grant nos. 15K15579 and 15H02563.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - To reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies (Pbx), better discrimination is needed. To identify clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPC) we determined the performance of LacdiNAc-glycosylated prostate-specific antigen (LDN-PSA) and LDN-PSA normalized by prostate volume (LDN-PSAD). We retrospectively measured LDN-PSA, total PSA (tPSA), and free PSA/tPSA (F/T PSA) values in 718 men who underwent a Pbx in 3 academic urology clinics in Japan and Canada (Pbx cohort) and in 174 PC patients who subsequently underwent radical prostatectomy in Australia (preop-PSA cohort). The assays were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) and decision curve analyses to discriminate CSPC. In the Pbx cohort, LDN-PSAD (AUC 0.860) provided significantly better clinical performance for discriminating CSPC compared with LDN-PSA (AUC 0.827, P = 0.0024), PSAD (AUC 0.809, P < 0.0001), tPSA (AUC 0.712, P < 0.0001), and F/T PSA (AUC 0.661, P < 0.0001). The decision curve analysis showed that using a risk threshold of 20% and adding LDN-PSA and LDN-PSAD to the base model (age, digital rectal examination status, tPSA, and F/T PSA) permitted avoidance of even more biopsies without missing CSPC (9.89% and 18.11%, respectively vs 2.23% [base model]). In the preop-PSA cohort, LDN-PSA values positively correlated with tumor volume and tPSA and were significantly higher in pT3, pathological Gleason score ≥ 7. Limitations include limited sample size, retrospective nature, and no family history information prior to biopsy. LacdiNAc-glycosylated PSA is significantly better than the conventional PSA test in identifying patients with CSPC. This study was approved by the ethics committee of each institution (“The Study about Carbohydrate Structure Change in Urological Disease”; approval no. 2014-195).
AB - To reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies (Pbx), better discrimination is needed. To identify clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPC) we determined the performance of LacdiNAc-glycosylated prostate-specific antigen (LDN-PSA) and LDN-PSA normalized by prostate volume (LDN-PSAD). We retrospectively measured LDN-PSA, total PSA (tPSA), and free PSA/tPSA (F/T PSA) values in 718 men who underwent a Pbx in 3 academic urology clinics in Japan and Canada (Pbx cohort) and in 174 PC patients who subsequently underwent radical prostatectomy in Australia (preop-PSA cohort). The assays were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) and decision curve analyses to discriminate CSPC. In the Pbx cohort, LDN-PSAD (AUC 0.860) provided significantly better clinical performance for discriminating CSPC compared with LDN-PSA (AUC 0.827, P = 0.0024), PSAD (AUC 0.809, P < 0.0001), tPSA (AUC 0.712, P < 0.0001), and F/T PSA (AUC 0.661, P < 0.0001). The decision curve analysis showed that using a risk threshold of 20% and adding LDN-PSA and LDN-PSAD to the base model (age, digital rectal examination status, tPSA, and F/T PSA) permitted avoidance of even more biopsies without missing CSPC (9.89% and 18.11%, respectively vs 2.23% [base model]). In the preop-PSA cohort, LDN-PSA values positively correlated with tumor volume and tPSA and were significantly higher in pT3, pathological Gleason score ≥ 7. Limitations include limited sample size, retrospective nature, and no family history information prior to biopsy. LacdiNAc-glycosylated PSA is significantly better than the conventional PSA test in identifying patients with CSPC. This study was approved by the ethics committee of each institution (“The Study about Carbohydrate Structure Change in Urological Disease”; approval no. 2014-195).
KW - biomarker
KW - clinically significant prostate cancer
KW - LacdiNAc
KW - N-glycan
KW - prostate-specific antigen
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071056732&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071056732&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/cas.14082
DO - 10.1111/cas.14082
M3 - Article
C2 - 31145522
AN - SCOPUS:85071056732
SN - 1347-9032
VL - 110
SP - 2573
EP - 2589
JO - Cancer Science
JF - Cancer Science
IS - 8
ER -