TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative Effects of Lingual and Facial Nerve Stimulation on Intracranial and Extracranial Vasomotor Responses in Anesthetized Cats
AU - Sato, Minoru
AU - Izumi, Hiroshi
AU - Karita, Keishiro
AU - Iwatsuki, Naofumi
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1997/6
Y1 - 1997/6
N2 - Electrical stimulaion of the central cut end of the lingual nerve (as reflex activation of parasympathetic nerve) or of the peripheral cut end of the facial (VIIth cranial) nerve (as direct activation of parasympathetic nerve) elicited the ipsilateral blood flow increases in lower lip, palate and common carotid artery (CCA) but not in frontal cerebral cortex in α-chloralose-urethane anesthetized, vagosympathectomized cats. No significant difference, in terms of the vasomotor changes examined, was found between lingual nerve and facial nerve stimulation. The results suggest that there is no somato-parasympathetic reflex vasodilator mechanism serving the frontal cerebral cortex, and that changes in CCA blood flow should not be taken to be indicative of blood flow changes in cerebrocortical blood flow However, we cannot entirely rule out the possibility of a neurogenic vasodilator influence of the facial pathway, since small blood flow increases in the frontal cerebral cortex were sometimes observed on facial nerve stimulation.
AB - Electrical stimulaion of the central cut end of the lingual nerve (as reflex activation of parasympathetic nerve) or of the peripheral cut end of the facial (VIIth cranial) nerve (as direct activation of parasympathetic nerve) elicited the ipsilateral blood flow increases in lower lip, palate and common carotid artery (CCA) but not in frontal cerebral cortex in α-chloralose-urethane anesthetized, vagosympathectomized cats. No significant difference, in terms of the vasomotor changes examined, was found between lingual nerve and facial nerve stimulation. The results suggest that there is no somato-parasympathetic reflex vasodilator mechanism serving the frontal cerebral cortex, and that changes in CCA blood flow should not be taken to be indicative of blood flow changes in cerebrocortical blood flow However, we cannot entirely rule out the possibility of a neurogenic vasodilator influence of the facial pathway, since small blood flow increases in the frontal cerebral cortex were sometimes observed on facial nerve stimulation.
KW - Cerebrocortical blood flow
KW - Common carotid artery
KW - Lip blood flow
KW - Palate blood flow
KW - Parasympathetic reflex vasodilation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031160350&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031160350&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1620/tjem.182.103
DO - 10.1620/tjem.182.103
M3 - Article
C2 - 9261929
AN - SCOPUS:0031160350
SN - 0040-8727
VL - 182
SP - 103
EP - 113
JO - Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine
JF - Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine
IS - 2
ER -