TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of Clinicopathological Features of Biliary Neuroendocrine Carcinoma with Adenocarcinoma
AU - Shiihara, Masahiro
AU - Higuchi, Ryota
AU - Furukawa, Toru
AU - Yazawa, Takehisa
AU - Uemura, Shuichiro
AU - Izumo, Wataru
AU - Yamamoto, Masakazu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - Objective: This study aimed to demonstrate the clinical features and postoperative outcomes of extrahepatic bile duct (EHBD) neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and compared with those of adenocarcinoma. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with EHBD cancer operated in our institution between 1995 and 2015. Results: Of 475 patients, 468 had adenocarcinoma, while 7 had NEC/mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) in this study. There were no notable preoperative and pathological features in patients with NEC/MANEC. However, patients with NEC/MANEC had a higher recurrence rate (51.8 vs. 100%, p = 0.016), poorer relapse-free survival (RFS) time (the median RFS time: 35 vs. 12 months, p = 0.006), and poorer overall survival (OS) time (the median OS time: 60 vs. 19 months, p = 0.078) than those with adenocarcinoma. Furthermore, patients with NEC/MANEC had higher rates of liver metastasis (11.9 vs. 85.7%, p < 0.001) than those with adenocarcinoma. In multivariable regression analysis, pathological type with NEC/MANEC was a risk factor for poorer RFS (p = 0.022, hazard ratio: 6.09). Conclusions: Patients with NEC/MANEC have high malignant potential and poor outcomes. It is necessary to develop an effective approach and postoperative adjuvant treatment for patients with NEC/MANEC.
AB - Objective: This study aimed to demonstrate the clinical features and postoperative outcomes of extrahepatic bile duct (EHBD) neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and compared with those of adenocarcinoma. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with EHBD cancer operated in our institution between 1995 and 2015. Results: Of 475 patients, 468 had adenocarcinoma, while 7 had NEC/mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) in this study. There were no notable preoperative and pathological features in patients with NEC/MANEC. However, patients with NEC/MANEC had a higher recurrence rate (51.8 vs. 100%, p = 0.016), poorer relapse-free survival (RFS) time (the median RFS time: 35 vs. 12 months, p = 0.006), and poorer overall survival (OS) time (the median OS time: 60 vs. 19 months, p = 0.078) than those with adenocarcinoma. Furthermore, patients with NEC/MANEC had higher rates of liver metastasis (11.9 vs. 85.7%, p < 0.001) than those with adenocarcinoma. In multivariable regression analysis, pathological type with NEC/MANEC was a risk factor for poorer RFS (p = 0.022, hazard ratio: 6.09). Conclusions: Patients with NEC/MANEC have high malignant potential and poor outcomes. It is necessary to develop an effective approach and postoperative adjuvant treatment for patients with NEC/MANEC.
KW - Bile duct
KW - Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma
KW - Neuroendocrine carcinoma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090140924&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85090140924&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1159/000508443
DO - 10.1159/000508443
M3 - Article
C2 - 32570243
AN - SCOPUS:85090140924
SN - 0253-4886
VL - 38
SP - 30
EP - 37
JO - Digestive Surgery
JF - Digestive Surgery
IS - 1
ER -