TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of four kinds of coagulants for the removal of picophytoplankton
AU - Aktas, Tugrul Selami
AU - Takeda, Fumihiko
AU - Maruo, Chikako
AU - Fujibayashi, Megumu
AU - Nishimura, Osamu
PY - 2013/4
Y1 - 2013/4
N2 - The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficiency of the coagulation process for the removal of picophytoplankton from drinking water and, in addition, to investigate the performance of simple coagulants such as alum and ferric chloride, and polymer coagulants such as PAC and PSI, in picophytoplankton removal. Two simple coagulants such as alum (Al2(SO4)3·16H2O) and ferric chloride (FeCl3·6H2O) and two polymer coagulants such as poly-silicate iron (PSI) and poly-aluminum chloride (PAC) were used in both raw water including picophytoplankton and synthetic water samples prepared by Synechococcus sp. Analyses included a picophytoplankton count, an assessment of the turbidity, dissolved organic carbon, UV254, and zeta potential and the settling time measurements. The removal efficiency of picophytoplankton during the coagulation-flocculation-sedimentation process was determined using simple and polymer coagulants. Water samples with lower coagulation pH had better picophytoplankton removal in coagulation-flocculation-sedimentation. The results indicate that even low coagulant doses of PSI in both raw water and artificial water performs better than the other three types of coagulants in terms of picophytoplankton, turbidity, UV254, and DOC removal.
AB - The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficiency of the coagulation process for the removal of picophytoplankton from drinking water and, in addition, to investigate the performance of simple coagulants such as alum and ferric chloride, and polymer coagulants such as PAC and PSI, in picophytoplankton removal. Two simple coagulants such as alum (Al2(SO4)3·16H2O) and ferric chloride (FeCl3·6H2O) and two polymer coagulants such as poly-silicate iron (PSI) and poly-aluminum chloride (PAC) were used in both raw water including picophytoplankton and synthetic water samples prepared by Synechococcus sp. Analyses included a picophytoplankton count, an assessment of the turbidity, dissolved organic carbon, UV254, and zeta potential and the settling time measurements. The removal efficiency of picophytoplankton during the coagulation-flocculation-sedimentation process was determined using simple and polymer coagulants. Water samples with lower coagulation pH had better picophytoplankton removal in coagulation-flocculation-sedimentation. The results indicate that even low coagulant doses of PSI in both raw water and artificial water performs better than the other three types of coagulants in terms of picophytoplankton, turbidity, UV254, and DOC removal.
KW - Coagulation
KW - Drinking water treatment
KW - Picophytoplankton
KW - Polymer coagulant
KW - Sedimentation
KW - Zeta potential
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877883117&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877883117&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/19443994.2012.750777
DO - 10.1080/19443994.2012.750777
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84877883117
SN - 1944-3994
VL - 51
SP - 3547
EP - 3557
JO - Desalination and Water Treatment
JF - Desalination and Water Treatment
IS - 16-18
ER -