TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of shielding effects of over-glasses-type and regular eyewear in terms of occupational eye dose reduction
AU - Shindo, Ryota
AU - Ohno, Saya
AU - Yamamoto, Keisuke
AU - Konta, Satoe
AU - Inaba, Yohei
AU - Suzuki, Masatoshi
AU - Zuguchi, Masayuki
AU - Chida, Koichi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Society for Radiological Protection. Published on behalf of SRP by IOP Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/6
Y1 - 2024/6
N2 - Given the new recommendations for occupational eye lens doses, various lead glasses have been used to reduce irradiation of interventional radiologists. However, the protection afforded by lead glasses over prescription glasses (thus over-glasses-type eyewear) has not been considered in detail. We used a phantom to compare the protective effects of such eyewear and regular eyewear of 0.07 mm lead-equivalent thickness. The shielding rates behind the eyewear and on the surface of the left eye of an anthropomorphic phantom were calculated. The left eye of the phantom was irradiated at various angles and the shielding effects were evaluated. We measured the radiation dose to the left side of the phantom using RPLDs attached to the left eye and to the surface/back of the left eyewear. Over-glasses-type eyewear afforded good protection against x-rays from the left and below; the average shielding rates on the surface of the left eye ranged from 0.70-0.72. In clinical settings, scattered radiation is incident on physicians’ eyes from the left and below, and through any gap in lead glasses. Over-glasses-type eyewear afforded better protection than regular eyewear of the same lead-equivalent thickness at the irradiation angles of concern in clinical settings. Although clinical evaluation is needed, we suggest over-glasses-type Pb eyewear even for physicians who do not wear prescription glasses.
AB - Given the new recommendations for occupational eye lens doses, various lead glasses have been used to reduce irradiation of interventional radiologists. However, the protection afforded by lead glasses over prescription glasses (thus over-glasses-type eyewear) has not been considered in detail. We used a phantom to compare the protective effects of such eyewear and regular eyewear of 0.07 mm lead-equivalent thickness. The shielding rates behind the eyewear and on the surface of the left eye of an anthropomorphic phantom were calculated. The left eye of the phantom was irradiated at various angles and the shielding effects were evaluated. We measured the radiation dose to the left side of the phantom using RPLDs attached to the left eye and to the surface/back of the left eyewear. Over-glasses-type eyewear afforded good protection against x-rays from the left and below; the average shielding rates on the surface of the left eye ranged from 0.70-0.72. In clinical settings, scattered radiation is incident on physicians’ eyes from the left and below, and through any gap in lead glasses. Over-glasses-type eyewear afforded better protection than regular eyewear of the same lead-equivalent thickness at the irradiation angles of concern in clinical settings. Although clinical evaluation is needed, we suggest over-glasses-type Pb eyewear even for physicians who do not wear prescription glasses.
KW - eye lens dose
KW - fluoroscopically guided procedures
KW - interventional radiology (IVR)
KW - Pb glasses (lead eyewear)
KW - radiation safety
KW - x-ray fluoroscopy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85193489311&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85193489311&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/1361-6498/ad4714
DO - 10.1088/1361-6498/ad4714
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 38701771
AN - SCOPUS:85193489311
SN - 0952-4746
VL - 44
JO - Journal of Radiological Protection
JF - Journal of Radiological Protection
IS - 2
M1 - 023501
ER -