TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of three aerosol representations of NHM-Chem (v1.0) for the simulations of air quality and climate-relevant variables
AU - Kajino, Mizuo
AU - Deushi, Makoto
AU - Sekiyama, Tsuyoshi Thomas
AU - Oshima, Naga
AU - Yumimoto, Keiya
AU - Tanaka, Taichu Yasumichi
AU - Ching, Joseph
AU - Hashimoto, Akihiro
AU - Yamamoto, Tetsuya
AU - Ikegami, Masaaki
AU - Kamada, Akane
AU - Miyashita, Makoto
AU - Inomata, Yayoi
AU - Shima, Shin Ichiro
AU - Khatri, Pradeep
AU - Shimizu, Atsushi
AU - Irie, Hitoshi
AU - Adachi, Kouji
AU - Zaizen, Yuji
AU - Igarashi, Yasuhito
AU - Ueda, Hiromasa
AU - Maki, Takashi
AU - Mikami, Masao
N1 - Funding Information:
Financial support. This work was mainly supported by the Fundamental Technology Research of MRI (M5 and P5), the Integrated Research Program for Advancing Climate Models (TOUGOU) grant no. JPMXD0717935561 and Arctic Challenge for Sustainability II (ArCS II), grant no. JPMXD1420318865 from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology Japan (MEXT), and Research Institute for Humanity and Nature (RIHN: a constituent member of NIHU) project no. 14200133 (Aakash). This work was also supported by the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Sciences (JSPS) KAKENHI grant nos. JP19H01155, JP16KK0018, JP19F19402, JP19H02649, JP18H03363, JP18H05292, and JP2000636) and the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (grant nos. JP-MEERF20165005, JPMEERF20172003, JPMEERF14S11203, JP-MEERF20202003, JPMEERF20205001, and JPMEERF20215003) of the Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency of Japan and in part by a grant for the Global Environmental Research Coordination System from the Ministry of Environment, Japan (MOEJ) (grant no. MLIT1753).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Author(s). This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PY - 2021/4/30
Y1 - 2021/4/30
N2 - This study provides comparisons of aerosol representation methods incorporated into a regional-scale nonhydrostatic meteorology-chemistry model (NHM-Chem). Three options for aerosol representations are currently available: the five-category non-equilibrium (Aitken, soot-free accumulation, soot-containing accumulation, dust, and sea salt), three-category non-equilibrium (Aitken, accumulation, and coarse), and bulk equilibrium (submicron, dust, and sea salt) methods. The three-category method is widely used in three-dimensional air quality models. The five-category method, the standard method of NHM-Chem, is an extensional development of the three-category method and provides improved predictions of variables relating to aerosol-cloud-radiation interaction processes by implementing separate treatments of light absorber and ice nuclei particles, namely, soot and dust, from the accumulation-and coarse-mode categories (implementation of aerosol feedback processes to NHM-Chem is still ongoing, though). The bulk equilibrium method was developed for operational air quality forecasting with simple aerosol dynamics representations. The total CPU times of the five-category and three-category methods were 91 % and 44 % greater than that of the bulk method, respectively. The bulk equilibrium method was shown to be eligible for operational forecast purposes, namely, the surface mass concentrations of air pollutants such as O3, mineral dust, and PM2.5. The simulated surface concentrations and depositions of bulk chemical species of the three-category method were not significantly different from those of the five-category method. However, the internal mixture assumption of soot/soot-free and dust/sea salt particles in the three-category method resulted in significant differences in the size distribution and hygroscopicity of the particles. The unrealistic dust/sea salt complete mixture of the three-category method induced significant errors in the prediction of the mineral dust-containing cloud condensation nuclei (CCN), which alters heterogeneous ice nucleation in cold rain processes. The overestimation of soot hygroscopicity by the three-category method induced errors in the BC-containing CCN, BC deposition, and light-absorbing aerosol optical thickness (AAOT). Nevertheless, the difference in AAOT was less pronounced with the three-category method because the overestimation of the absorption enhancement was compensated by the overestimation of hygroscopic growth and the consequent loss due to in-cloud scavenging. In terms of total properties, such as aerosol optical thickness (AOT) and CCN, the results of the three-category method were acceptable.
AB - This study provides comparisons of aerosol representation methods incorporated into a regional-scale nonhydrostatic meteorology-chemistry model (NHM-Chem). Three options for aerosol representations are currently available: the five-category non-equilibrium (Aitken, soot-free accumulation, soot-containing accumulation, dust, and sea salt), three-category non-equilibrium (Aitken, accumulation, and coarse), and bulk equilibrium (submicron, dust, and sea salt) methods. The three-category method is widely used in three-dimensional air quality models. The five-category method, the standard method of NHM-Chem, is an extensional development of the three-category method and provides improved predictions of variables relating to aerosol-cloud-radiation interaction processes by implementing separate treatments of light absorber and ice nuclei particles, namely, soot and dust, from the accumulation-and coarse-mode categories (implementation of aerosol feedback processes to NHM-Chem is still ongoing, though). The bulk equilibrium method was developed for operational air quality forecasting with simple aerosol dynamics representations. The total CPU times of the five-category and three-category methods were 91 % and 44 % greater than that of the bulk method, respectively. The bulk equilibrium method was shown to be eligible for operational forecast purposes, namely, the surface mass concentrations of air pollutants such as O3, mineral dust, and PM2.5. The simulated surface concentrations and depositions of bulk chemical species of the three-category method were not significantly different from those of the five-category method. However, the internal mixture assumption of soot/soot-free and dust/sea salt particles in the three-category method resulted in significant differences in the size distribution and hygroscopicity of the particles. The unrealistic dust/sea salt complete mixture of the three-category method induced significant errors in the prediction of the mineral dust-containing cloud condensation nuclei (CCN), which alters heterogeneous ice nucleation in cold rain processes. The overestimation of soot hygroscopicity by the three-category method induced errors in the BC-containing CCN, BC deposition, and light-absorbing aerosol optical thickness (AAOT). Nevertheless, the difference in AAOT was less pronounced with the three-category method because the overestimation of the absorption enhancement was compensated by the overestimation of hygroscopic growth and the consequent loss due to in-cloud scavenging. In terms of total properties, such as aerosol optical thickness (AOT) and CCN, the results of the three-category method were acceptable.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105499834&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85105499834&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5194/gmd-14-2235-2021
DO - 10.5194/gmd-14-2235-2021
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85105499834
SN - 1991-959X
VL - 14
SP - 2235
EP - 2264
JO - Geoscientific Model Development
JF - Geoscientific Model Development
IS - 4
ER -