TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of two devices for respiratory impedance measurement using a forced oscillation technique
T2 - Basic study using phantom models
AU - Tanimura, Kazuya
AU - Hirai, Toyohiro
AU - Sato, Susumu
AU - Hasegawa, Koichi
AU - Muro, Shigeo
AU - Kurosawa, Hajime
AU - Mishima, Michiaki
PY - 2014/9
Y1 - 2014/9
N2 - Since commercial forced oscillation technique (FOT) devices became available, they have been widely used for physiological assessments, mainly of obstructive lung diseases. However, it is not known whether the impedance values measured with different devices are identical. In this study, two FOT devices - the impulse oscillometry system (IOS) and the MostGraph (MG) - were compared using phantom models. The resistance values varied up to 10 % from estimated values in both devices. Additionally, there was a difference in frequency dependence for the resistance between the devices. The reactance values measured with MG were higher than those measured with IOS. The effects of ventilation on the measured impedance values were higher for IOS than for MG, especially at lower frequencies. We concluded that the devices do not always generate identical impedance values. Thus, differences between the devices should be taken into consideration when evaluating clinical data.
AB - Since commercial forced oscillation technique (FOT) devices became available, they have been widely used for physiological assessments, mainly of obstructive lung diseases. However, it is not known whether the impedance values measured with different devices are identical. In this study, two FOT devices - the impulse oscillometry system (IOS) and the MostGraph (MG) - were compared using phantom models. The resistance values varied up to 10 % from estimated values in both devices. Additionally, there was a difference in frequency dependence for the resistance between the devices. The reactance values measured with MG were higher than those measured with IOS. The effects of ventilation on the measured impedance values were higher for IOS than for MG, especially at lower frequencies. We concluded that the devices do not always generate identical impedance values. Thus, differences between the devices should be taken into consideration when evaluating clinical data.
KW - Forced oscillation
KW - Frequency dependence
KW - Impedance
KW - Reactance
KW - Resistance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906944140&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906944140&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12576-014-0329-4
DO - 10.1007/s12576-014-0329-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 25034109
AN - SCOPUS:84906944140
SN - 1880-6546
VL - 64
SP - 377
EP - 382
JO - Journal of Physiological Sciences
JF - Journal of Physiological Sciences
IS - 5
ER -