Conformity and precision of CO₂ densimetry in CO₂ inclusions: Microthermometry versus Raman microspectroscopic densimetry

To assess the ability of densimetry for CO₂ fluid in CO ₂ inclusions, we compare two methods, microthermometry and Raman microspectroscopic densimetry for CO₂. The comparative experiment was performed for nine CO₂ inclusions in three mantle xenoliths. The results are as follows: (1) microthermometry precisely determines CO₂ density with the range of 0.65 to 1.18 g/cm³ compared with Raman microspectroscopic densimetry; (2) CO₂ density obtained by Raman microspectroscopic densimetry is fairly consistent with that by microthermometry; (3) it is hard to determine CO₂ density in CO ₂ inclusion with diameter of less than around 3 μm using microthermometry; and (4) microthermometry can be applied only to the CO ₂ inclusion whose CO₂ density ranges from around 0.65 to 1.18 g/cm³, whereas the Raman microspectroscopic densimetry is applicable to CO₂ density ranging from 0.1 to 1.24 g/cm³. The above features carry the potential for estimation of depth origin of mantle-derived rocks. The depth where the rocks were trapped by host magma can be estimated using both geothermometric data and CO₂ fluid density in CO₂ inclusions in the rocks. Typical precisions of density of CO₂ in CO₂ inclusions obtained by the Raman microspectroscopic densimetry (∼0.01 g/cm³) and by the microthermometry (< 0.001 g/cm³) correspond to uncertainties in the depth origin of 2.4 km and < 1.7 km, respectively, at 1000 ± 50 °C. In case of the mantle under 750-1250 °C and 1 GPa, the CO ₂ fluid has a density ranging from 1.06 g/cm³ to 1.21 g/cm³, which are well measured by the Raman microspectroscopic densimetry. Combination of both densimetries for CO₂ in mantle minerals elucidates the deep structure of the Earth.