TY - JOUR
T1 - Cortical activation in the processing of passive sentences in L1 and L2
T2 - An fMRI study
AU - Yokoyama, Satoru
AU - Okamoto, Hideyuki
AU - Miyamoto, Tadao
AU - Yoshimoto, Kei
AU - Kim, Jungho
AU - Iwata, Kazuki
AU - Jeong, Hyeonjeong
AU - Uchida, Shinya
AU - Ikuta, Naho
AU - Sassa, Yuko
AU - Nakamura, Wataru
AU - Horie, Kaoru
AU - Sato, Shigeru
AU - Kawashima, Ryuta
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Professor Noriaki Yusa of Miyagi Gakuin Women's University and Associate Professor Masatoshi Koizumi of Tohoku University for their helpful comments. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. This study was supported by JST/RISTEX, R&D Promotion Scheme for Regional Proposals Promoted by TAO, and the 21st Century Center of Excellence (COE) Program (Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology) entitled “A Strategic Research and Education Center for an Integrated Approach to Language and Cognition” (Tohoku University).
PY - 2006/4/1
Y1 - 2006/4/1
N2 - The question of whether the bilingual brain processes a first and second language (L1 and L2, respectively) differently is a central issue in many psycholinguistic and neurolinguistic studies. This study used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate whether late bilinguals process structurally complex sentences in L1 and L2 in different cortical networks. For this purpose, we directly compared brain activity during the processing of active and passive sentences in both L1 and L2. We asked 36 healthy subjects to judge whether or not a presented sentence was semantically plausible. Both L1 and L2 activated the left hemispheric language-related regions such as the left inferior frontal, superior/middle temporal, and parietal cortices. However, we found different activation patterns between L1 and L2 in the processing of passive sentences. Passive sentences elicited greater activation than their active counterparts in the left pars triangularis, the premotor area, and the superior parietal lobule in Japanese, but not in English. Furthermore, there was a significant interaction between sentence type (active versus passive) and language (Japanese versus English) in the left pars orbitalis. The results of this study indicate that late bilinguals use similar cortical regions to comprehend both L1 and L2. However, when late bilinguals are presented with structurally complex sentences, the involvement of these regions differs between L1 and L2. These results suggest that, in addition to age of L2 acquisition and L2 proficiency, differences in grammatical construction affect cortical representation during the comprehension of L1 and L2.
AB - The question of whether the bilingual brain processes a first and second language (L1 and L2, respectively) differently is a central issue in many psycholinguistic and neurolinguistic studies. This study used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate whether late bilinguals process structurally complex sentences in L1 and L2 in different cortical networks. For this purpose, we directly compared brain activity during the processing of active and passive sentences in both L1 and L2. We asked 36 healthy subjects to judge whether or not a presented sentence was semantically plausible. Both L1 and L2 activated the left hemispheric language-related regions such as the left inferior frontal, superior/middle temporal, and parietal cortices. However, we found different activation patterns between L1 and L2 in the processing of passive sentences. Passive sentences elicited greater activation than their active counterparts in the left pars triangularis, the premotor area, and the superior parietal lobule in Japanese, but not in English. Furthermore, there was a significant interaction between sentence type (active versus passive) and language (Japanese versus English) in the left pars orbitalis. The results of this study indicate that late bilinguals use similar cortical regions to comprehend both L1 and L2. However, when late bilinguals are presented with structurally complex sentences, the involvement of these regions differs between L1 and L2. These results suggest that, in addition to age of L2 acquisition and L2 proficiency, differences in grammatical construction affect cortical representation during the comprehension of L1 and L2.
KW - Bilingual
KW - fMRI
KW - Passive sentence
KW - Sentence comprehension
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645115934&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645115934&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.066
DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.066
M3 - Article
C2 - 16300965
AN - SCOPUS:33645115934
SN - 1053-8119
VL - 30
SP - 570
EP - 579
JO - NeuroImage
JF - NeuroImage
IS - 2
ER -