TY - JOUR
T1 - CTA-Based Non-invasive Estimation of Pressure Gradients Across a CoA
T2 - a Validation Against Cardiac Catheterisation
AU - Zhang, Mingzi
AU - Liu, Jinlong
AU - Zhang, Haibo
AU - Verrelli, David I.
AU - Wang, Qian
AU - Hu, Liwei
AU - Li, Yujie
AU - Ohta, Makoto
AU - Liu, Jinfen
AU - Zhao, Xi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - Non-invasive estimation of pressure gradients across a coarctation of the aorta (CoA) can reduce the need for diagnostic cardiac catheterisation. We aimed to validate two novel computational strategies—target-value approaching (TVA) and target-value fixing (TVF)—together with unrefined Doppler estimates, and to compare their diagnostic performance in identifying critical pressure drops for 40 patients. Compared to catheterisation, no statistically significant difference was demonstrated with TVA (P = 0.086), in contrast to TVF (P = 0.005) and unrefined Doppler echocardiography (P < 0.001). TVA manifested the strongest correlation with catheterisation (r = 0.93), compared to TVF (r = 0.83) and echocardiography (r = 0.67) (all P < 0.001). In discriminating pressure gradients greater than 20 mmHg, TVA, TVF, and echocardiography had respective sensitivities of 0.92, 0.88, and 0.80; specificities of 0.93, 0.80, and 0.73; and AUCs of 0.96, 0.89, and 0.80. The TVA strategy may serve as an effective and easily implemented approach to be used in clinical management of patients with CoA. [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
AB - Non-invasive estimation of pressure gradients across a coarctation of the aorta (CoA) can reduce the need for diagnostic cardiac catheterisation. We aimed to validate two novel computational strategies—target-value approaching (TVA) and target-value fixing (TVF)—together with unrefined Doppler estimates, and to compare their diagnostic performance in identifying critical pressure drops for 40 patients. Compared to catheterisation, no statistically significant difference was demonstrated with TVA (P = 0.086), in contrast to TVF (P = 0.005) and unrefined Doppler echocardiography (P < 0.001). TVA manifested the strongest correlation with catheterisation (r = 0.93), compared to TVF (r = 0.83) and echocardiography (r = 0.67) (all P < 0.001). In discriminating pressure gradients greater than 20 mmHg, TVA, TVF, and echocardiography had respective sensitivities of 0.92, 0.88, and 0.80; specificities of 0.93, 0.80, and 0.73; and AUCs of 0.96, 0.89, and 0.80. The TVA strategy may serve as an effective and easily implemented approach to be used in clinical management of patients with CoA. [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
KW - Cardiac catheterisation
KW - Coarctation of the aorta
KW - Computational fluid dynamics
KW - CTA
KW - Non-invasive estimation
KW - Pressure gradient
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102194241&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85102194241&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12265-020-10092-7
DO - 10.1007/s12265-020-10092-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 33661435
AN - SCOPUS:85102194241
SN - 1937-5387
VL - 14
SP - 873
EP - 882
JO - Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research
JF - Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research
IS - 5
ER -