TY - JOUR
T1 - Deformation of lipid droplets in fixed samples
AU - Fukumoto, Satoshi
AU - Fujimoto, Toyoshi
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements The authors thank Dr. A. Kudo for instruction on image analysis, and Ms K. Tauchi-Sato, Ms M. Murata, and Mr. T. Okumura for technical assistance. This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid from the Japanese Government and a research grant from the Novartis Science Foundation to T.F.
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - Nile red, Sudan III, and oil red O have been used to stain lipid droplets (LDs) for fluorescence microscopy. We noticed that LDs labeled by Nile red are different in appearance from those stained by the latter two dyes. To understand the cause of the difference, we used sequential labeling procedures (first LD stain-photography-quenching-second LD stain-photography), and examined the effect of several factors. Immunofluorescence labeling for adipose differentiation-related protein (ADRP), an LD marker, was also observed comparatively with the lipid stains. As a result, we found that ethanol and isopropanol used for Sudan III and oil red O staining, respectively, and glycerol used for mounting, cause fusion of adjacent LDs even in glutaraldehydefixed samples. By the same treatment, immunofluorescence labeling for ADRP was dislocated to the rim of large LDs that were formed as a result of the artifactual fusion. The result indicates that the LD structure can be better observed with Nile red than with Sudan III or oil red O.
AB - Nile red, Sudan III, and oil red O have been used to stain lipid droplets (LDs) for fluorescence microscopy. We noticed that LDs labeled by Nile red are different in appearance from those stained by the latter two dyes. To understand the cause of the difference, we used sequential labeling procedures (first LD stain-photography-quenching-second LD stain-photography), and examined the effect of several factors. Immunofluorescence labeling for adipose differentiation-related protein (ADRP), an LD marker, was also observed comparatively with the lipid stains. As a result, we found that ethanol and isopropanol used for Sudan III and oil red O staining, respectively, and glycerol used for mounting, cause fusion of adjacent LDs even in glutaraldehydefixed samples. By the same treatment, immunofluorescence labeling for ADRP was dislocated to the rim of large LDs that were formed as a result of the artifactual fusion. The result indicates that the LD structure can be better observed with Nile red than with Sudan III or oil red O.
KW - ADRP
KW - Lipid droplets
KW - Nile red
KW - Oil red O
KW - Sudan III
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036435902&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036435902&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00418-002-0462-7
DO - 10.1007/s00418-002-0462-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 12432454
AN - SCOPUS:0036435902
SN - 0948-6143
VL - 118
SP - 423
EP - 428
JO - Histochemistry and Cell Biology
JF - Histochemistry and Cell Biology
IS - 5
ER -