TY - JOUR
T1 - Determination of interaction parameters in a bottom-up approach employed in reactive dissipative particle dynamics simulations for thermosetting polymers
AU - Li, Kaiwen
AU - Kikugawa, Gota
AU - Kawagoe, Yoshiaki
AU - Zhao, Yinbo
AU - Okabe, Tomonaga
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Royal Society of Chemistry.
PY - 2024/5/14
Y1 - 2024/5/14
N2 - The limitations in previous dissipative particle dynamics (DPD) studies confined simulations to a narrow resin range. This study refines DPD parameter calculation methodology, extending its application to diverse polymer materials. Using a bottom-up approach with molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, we evaluated solubility parameters and bead number density governing nonbonded interactions via the Flory-Huggins parameter and covalent-bonded interactions. Two solubility parameter methods, Hildebrand and Krevelen-Hoftyzer, were compared for DPD simulations. The Hildebrand method, utilizing MD simulations, demonstrates higher consistency and broader applicability in determining solubility parameters for all DPD particles. The DPD/MD curing reaction process was examined in three epoxy systems: DGEBA/4,4′-DDS, DGEBA/MPDA and DGEBA/DETA. Calculations for the curing profile, gelation point, radial distribution function and branch ratio were performed. Compared to MD data for DGEBA/4,4′-DDS, the maximum deviation in secondary reactions between epoxy and amine groups according to DPD simulations with Krevelen-Hoftyzer was 14.8%, while with the Hildebrand method, it was 1.7%. The accuracy of the DPD curing reaction in reproducing the structural properties verifies its expanded application to general polymeric material simulations. The proposed curing DPD simulations, with a short run time and minimal computational resources, contributes to high-throughput screening for optimal resins and investigates mesoscopic inhomogeneous structures in large resin systems.
AB - The limitations in previous dissipative particle dynamics (DPD) studies confined simulations to a narrow resin range. This study refines DPD parameter calculation methodology, extending its application to diverse polymer materials. Using a bottom-up approach with molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, we evaluated solubility parameters and bead number density governing nonbonded interactions via the Flory-Huggins parameter and covalent-bonded interactions. Two solubility parameter methods, Hildebrand and Krevelen-Hoftyzer, were compared for DPD simulations. The Hildebrand method, utilizing MD simulations, demonstrates higher consistency and broader applicability in determining solubility parameters for all DPD particles. The DPD/MD curing reaction process was examined in three epoxy systems: DGEBA/4,4′-DDS, DGEBA/MPDA and DGEBA/DETA. Calculations for the curing profile, gelation point, radial distribution function and branch ratio were performed. Compared to MD data for DGEBA/4,4′-DDS, the maximum deviation in secondary reactions between epoxy and amine groups according to DPD simulations with Krevelen-Hoftyzer was 14.8%, while with the Hildebrand method, it was 1.7%. The accuracy of the DPD curing reaction in reproducing the structural properties verifies its expanded application to general polymeric material simulations. The proposed curing DPD simulations, with a short run time and minimal computational resources, contributes to high-throughput screening for optimal resins and investigates mesoscopic inhomogeneous structures in large resin systems.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85194351770&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85194351770&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1039/d3sm01743e
DO - 10.1039/d3sm01743e
M3 - Article
C2 - 38805009
AN - SCOPUS:85194351770
SN - 1744-683X
VL - 20
SP - 4591
EP - 4607
JO - Soft Matter
JF - Soft Matter
IS - 23
ER -