TY - JOUR
T1 - Determination of the dipping direction of a blind reverse fault from InSAR
T2 - case study on the 2017 Sefid Sang earthquake, northeastern Iran
AU - Ghayournajarkar, Nematollah
AU - Fukushima, Yo
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) under Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) program to implement the Sendai framework. We used the Phased-Array L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar-2 (PALSAR-2) data which were shared among PIXEL (PALSAR Interferometry Consortium to Study our Evolving Land surface), and provided from Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) under a cooperative research contract with the Earthquake Research institute (ERI), University of Tokyo. We are also indebted to the European Space Agency (ESA) for providing the Sentinel-1A SAR data. We thank the Iranian Seismological Center (IRSC) for providing us with aftershocks data. All of the SAR data were processed using GMTSAR package (Sandwell ). Some figures were generated using the Generic Mapping Tools (GMT) software (Wessel and Smith ). K. Materna and an anonymous reviewer provided constructive suggestions that improve the clarity of the manuscript.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) under Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) program to implement the Sendai framework. We used the Phased-Array L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar-2 (PALSAR-2) data which were shared among PIXEL (PALSAR Interferometry Consortium to Study our Evolving Land surface), and provided from Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) under a cooperative research contract with the Earthquake Research institute (ERI), University of Tokyo. We are also indebted to the European Space Agency (ESA) for providing the Sentinel-1A SAR data. We thank the Iranian Seismological Center (IRSC) for providing us with aftershocks data. All of the SAR data were processed using GMTSAR package (Sandwell 2011). Some figures were generated using the Generic Mapping Tools (GMT) software (Wessel and Smith 1995). K. Materna and an anonymous reviewer provided constructive suggestions that improve the clarity of the manuscript.
Funding Information:
This study was partially supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Sciences KAKENHI Grant Number JP18K03795. Acknowledgements
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s).
PY - 2020/12/1
Y1 - 2020/12/1
N2 - Determining the fault parameters of an earthquake is fundamental for studying the earthquake physics, understanding the seismotectonics of the region, and forecasting future earthquake activities in the surrounding area. Dense crustal deformation data such as Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) are useful for fault parameter determination, but determining the dipping direction of a blind fault is often challenging when the size of the earthquake is not large (M < 7) or when the coverage of the deformed area is limited to capture the details of rupture. The 5th April 2017, Mw 6.1 earthquake occurred near the city of Sefid Sang, northeast of Iran, provides an excellent case for exploring the potential of InSAR data for determining the dipping direction of a blind reverse fault. Using Advanced Land Observing Satellite-2 (ALOS-2) and Sentinel-1A interferograms of four different observation directions and a fault slip inversion method that allows thorough exploration of the fault geometry led to two candidates of reverse fault models, dipping either to the northeast or the south. The results show that the fault models of both dipping directions explain the data well, with a slight advantage in the northeast-dipping fault model in terms of the misfit when the atmospheric corrections were applied. The northeast-dipping fault model is, in addition, more consistent with the strike of the mapped active faults in the region and with the aftershock distribution, from which we infer that the 2017 Sefid Sang earthquake occurred on a northeast-dipping dextral-reverse fault. The preferred fault model has a strike angle of 314.8°, dip angle of 47.4° and rake angle of 130.3°, and a slip distribution of maximum 1.35 m at depth of 5 km equivalent to Mw 6.0. This study illuminates the difficulty of determining the dipping direction of blind faults even with InSAR measurements from multiple directions, but also that correcting for the atmospheric noise and comparing with other kinds of data can help infer the fault dipping direction.[Figure not available: see fulltext.].
AB - Determining the fault parameters of an earthquake is fundamental for studying the earthquake physics, understanding the seismotectonics of the region, and forecasting future earthquake activities in the surrounding area. Dense crustal deformation data such as Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) are useful for fault parameter determination, but determining the dipping direction of a blind fault is often challenging when the size of the earthquake is not large (M < 7) or when the coverage of the deformed area is limited to capture the details of rupture. The 5th April 2017, Mw 6.1 earthquake occurred near the city of Sefid Sang, northeast of Iran, provides an excellent case for exploring the potential of InSAR data for determining the dipping direction of a blind reverse fault. Using Advanced Land Observing Satellite-2 (ALOS-2) and Sentinel-1A interferograms of four different observation directions and a fault slip inversion method that allows thorough exploration of the fault geometry led to two candidates of reverse fault models, dipping either to the northeast or the south. The results show that the fault models of both dipping directions explain the data well, with a slight advantage in the northeast-dipping fault model in terms of the misfit when the atmospheric corrections were applied. The northeast-dipping fault model is, in addition, more consistent with the strike of the mapped active faults in the region and with the aftershock distribution, from which we infer that the 2017 Sefid Sang earthquake occurred on a northeast-dipping dextral-reverse fault. The preferred fault model has a strike angle of 314.8°, dip angle of 47.4° and rake angle of 130.3°, and a slip distribution of maximum 1.35 m at depth of 5 km equivalent to Mw 6.0. This study illuminates the difficulty of determining the dipping direction of blind faults even with InSAR measurements from multiple directions, but also that correcting for the atmospheric noise and comparing with other kinds of data can help infer the fault dipping direction.[Figure not available: see fulltext.].
KW - ALOS-2
KW - Blind reverse fault
KW - Coseismic deformation
KW - InSAR
KW - Northeastern Iran
KW - Sefid Sang earthquake
KW - Sentinel-1A
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084440484&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85084440484&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s40623-020-01190-6
DO - 10.1186/s40623-020-01190-6
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85084440484
SN - 1343-8832
VL - 72
JO - Earth, Planets and Space
JF - Earth, Planets and Space
IS - 1
M1 - 64
ER -