TY - JOUR
T1 - Direction-specific fMRI adaptation reveals the visual cortical network underlying the "Rotating Snakes" illusion
AU - Ashida, Hiroshi
AU - Kuriki, Ichiro
AU - Murakami, Ikuya
AU - Hisakata, Rumi
AU - Kitaoka, Akiyoshi
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by JSPS grant-in-aid for scientific research ( B20330149 for H. Ashida and A22243044 for A. Kitaoka). Portions of the results were presented at VSS 2010 as an abstract form. We thank Andy Smith for helpful comments and suggestions.
PY - 2012/7/16
Y1 - 2012/7/16
N2 - The "Rotating Snakes" figure elicits a clear sense of anomalous motion in stationary repetitive patterns. We used an event-related fMRI adaptation paradigm to investigate cortical mechanisms underlying the illusory motion. Following an adapting stimulus (S1) and a blank period, a probe stimulus (S2) that elicited illusory motion either in the same or in the opposite direction was presented. Attention was controlled by a fixation task, and control experiments precluded explanations in terms of artefacts of local adaptation, afterimages, or involuntary eye movements. Recorded BOLD responses were smaller for S2 in the same direction than S2 in the opposite direction in V1-V4, V3A, and MT+, indicating direction-selective adaptation. Adaptation in MT. + was correlated with adaptation in V1 but not in V4. With possible downstream inheritance of adaptation, it is most likely that adaptation predominantly occurred in V1. The results extend our previous findings of activation in MT. + (I. Kuriki, H. Ashida, I. Murakami, and A. Kitaoka, 2008), revealing the activity of the cortical network for motion processing from V1 towards MT+. This provides evidence for the role of front-end motion detectors, which has been assumed in proposed models of the illusion.
AB - The "Rotating Snakes" figure elicits a clear sense of anomalous motion in stationary repetitive patterns. We used an event-related fMRI adaptation paradigm to investigate cortical mechanisms underlying the illusory motion. Following an adapting stimulus (S1) and a blank period, a probe stimulus (S2) that elicited illusory motion either in the same or in the opposite direction was presented. Attention was controlled by a fixation task, and control experiments precluded explanations in terms of artefacts of local adaptation, afterimages, or involuntary eye movements. Recorded BOLD responses were smaller for S2 in the same direction than S2 in the opposite direction in V1-V4, V3A, and MT+, indicating direction-selective adaptation. Adaptation in MT. + was correlated with adaptation in V1 but not in V4. With possible downstream inheritance of adaptation, it is most likely that adaptation predominantly occurred in V1. The results extend our previous findings of activation in MT. + (I. Kuriki, H. Ashida, I. Murakami, and A. Kitaoka, 2008), revealing the activity of the cortical network for motion processing from V1 towards MT+. This provides evidence for the role of front-end motion detectors, which has been assumed in proposed models of the illusion.
KW - Adaptation
KW - FMRI
KW - Illusion
KW - MT+
KW - Motion
KW - V1
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861337930&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861337930&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.033
DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.033
M3 - Article
C2 - 22450297
AN - SCOPUS:84861337930
SN - 1053-8119
VL - 61
SP - 1143
EP - 1152
JO - NeuroImage
JF - NeuroImage
IS - 4
ER -