TY - JOUR
T1 - Does antihypertensive drug class affect day-to-day variability of self-measured home blood pressure? The HOMED-BP study
AU - On behalf of the Hypertensive Objective Treatment Based on Measurement by Electrical Devices of Blood Pressure (HOMED-BP) Study Investigators
AU - Asayama, Kei
AU - Ohkubo, Takayoshi
AU - Hanazawa, Tomohiro
AU - Watabe, Daisuke
AU - Hosaka, Miki
AU - Satoh, Michihiro
AU - Yasui, Daisaku
AU - Staessen, Jan A.
AU - Imai, Yutaka
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 The Authors.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Background--Recent literature suggests that blood pressure variability (BPV) predicts outcome beyond blood pressure level (BPL) and that antihypertensive drug classes differentially influence BPV. We compared calcium channel blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockade for effects on changes in self-measured home BPL and BPV and for their prognostic significance in newly treated hypertensive patients. Methods and Results--We enrolled 2484 patients randomly allocated to first-line treatment with a calcium channel blocker (n=833), an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (n=821), or angiotensin receptor blockade (n=830). Home blood pressures in the morning and evening were measured for 5 days off treatment before randomization and for 5 days after 2 to 4 weeks of randomized drug treatment. We assessed BPL and BPV changes as estimated by variability independent of the mean and compared cardiovascular outcomes. Home BPL response in each group was significant (P≤0.0001) but small in the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor group (systolic/diastolic: 4.6/2.8 mm Hg) compared with the groups treated with a calcium channel blocker (systolic/diastolic: 8.3/3.9 mm Hg) and angiotensin receptor blockade (systolic/diastolic: 8.2/4.5 mm Hg). In multivariable adjusted analyses, changes in home variability independent of the mean did not differ among the 3 drug classes (P≥0.054). Evening variability independent of the mean before treatment significantly predicted hard cardiovascular events independent of the corresponding home BPL (P≤0.022), whereas BPV did not predict any cardiovascular outcome based on the morning measurement (P≥0.056). Home BPV captured after monotherapy had no predictive power for cardiovascular outcome (P≥0.22). Conclusions--Self-measured home evening BPV estimated by variability independent of the mean had prognostic significance, whereas antihypertensive drug classes had no significant impact on BPV changes. Home BPL should remain the primary focus for risk stratification and treatment.
AB - Background--Recent literature suggests that blood pressure variability (BPV) predicts outcome beyond blood pressure level (BPL) and that antihypertensive drug classes differentially influence BPV. We compared calcium channel blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockade for effects on changes in self-measured home BPL and BPV and for their prognostic significance in newly treated hypertensive patients. Methods and Results--We enrolled 2484 patients randomly allocated to first-line treatment with a calcium channel blocker (n=833), an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (n=821), or angiotensin receptor blockade (n=830). Home blood pressures in the morning and evening were measured for 5 days off treatment before randomization and for 5 days after 2 to 4 weeks of randomized drug treatment. We assessed BPL and BPV changes as estimated by variability independent of the mean and compared cardiovascular outcomes. Home BPL response in each group was significant (P≤0.0001) but small in the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor group (systolic/diastolic: 4.6/2.8 mm Hg) compared with the groups treated with a calcium channel blocker (systolic/diastolic: 8.3/3.9 mm Hg) and angiotensin receptor blockade (systolic/diastolic: 8.2/4.5 mm Hg). In multivariable adjusted analyses, changes in home variability independent of the mean did not differ among the 3 drug classes (P≥0.054). Evening variability independent of the mean before treatment significantly predicted hard cardiovascular events independent of the corresponding home BPL (P≤0.022), whereas BPV did not predict any cardiovascular outcome based on the morning measurement (P≥0.056). Home BPV captured after monotherapy had no predictive power for cardiovascular outcome (P≥0.22). Conclusions--Self-measured home evening BPV estimated by variability independent of the mean had prognostic significance, whereas antihypertensive drug classes had no significant impact on BPV changes. Home BPL should remain the primary focus for risk stratification and treatment.
KW - Antihypertensive drugs
KW - Blood pressure variability
KW - Cardiovascular outcomes
KW - Home blood pressure
KW - Morning and evening self-measurement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85000824475&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85000824475&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1161/JAHA.115.002995
DO - 10.1161/JAHA.115.002995
M3 - Article
C2 - 27009620
AN - SCOPUS:85000824475
SN - 2047-9980
VL - 5
JO - Journal of the American Heart Association
JF - Journal of the American Heart Association
IS - 3
M1 - e002995
ER -