Does the photosynthetic light-acclimation need change in leaf anatomy?

Riichi Oguchi, K. Hikosaka, T. Hirose

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

319 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is a strong correlation between leaf thickness and the light-saturated rate of photosynthesis per unit leaf area (Pmax). However, when leaves are exposed to higher light intensities after maturation, Pmax often increases without increasing leaf thickness. To elucidate the mechanism with which mature leaves increase Pmax, the change in anatomical and physiological characteristics of mature leaves of Chenopodium album, which was transferred from low to high light condition, were examined. When compared with leaves subjected to low light continuously (LL leaves), the leaves transferred from low to high light (LH leaves) significantly increased Pmax. The transfer also increased the area of chloroplasts facing the intercellular space (Sε) and maintained a strong correlation between Pmax and Sε. The mesophyll cells of LL leaves had open spaces along cell walls where chloroplasts were absent, which enabled the leaves to increase Pmax when they were exposed to high light (LH). However, the LH leaves were not thick enough to allow further increase in Pmax to the level in HH leaves. Thus leaf thickness determines an upper limit of Pmax of leaves subjected to a change from low to high light conditions. Shade leaves would only increase Pmax when they have open space to accommodate chloroplasts which elongate after light conditions improve.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)505-512
Number of pages8
JournalPlant, Cell and Environment
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003 Apr 1

Keywords

  • Chlorophyll
  • Chloroplasts
  • Leaf anatomy
  • Leaf nitrogen
  • Mature leaves
  • Photosynthetic capacity
  • Rubisco
  • Sun/ shade
  • Transfer experiment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does the photosynthetic light-acclimation need change in leaf anatomy?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this