TY - JOUR
T1 - Does trade openness improve environmental quality?
AU - Managi, Shunsuke
AU - Hibiki, Akira
AU - Tsurumi, Tetsuya
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank Arik Levinson (the editor), the anonymous referees, Werner Antweiler, Naoto Jinji, Charles Mason, Carol McAusland, and Tsunehiro Otsuki for helpful comments. We also thank participants at the 2009 AERE/ASSA meeting. This research was funded by the National Institute for Environmental Studies and a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT). The results and conclusions of this paper do not necessary represent the views of the funding agencies.
PY - 2009/11
Y1 - 2009/11
N2 - The literature on trade openness, economic development, and the environment is largely inconclusive about the environmental consequences of trade. This study treats trade and income as endogenous and estimates the overall impact of trade openness on environmental quality using the instrumental variables technique. We find that whether or not trade has a beneficial effect on the environment varies depending on the pollutant and the country. Trade is found to benefit the environment in OECD countries. It has detrimental effects, however, on sulfur dioxide (SO2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in non-OECD countries, although it does lower biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) emissions in these countries. We also find the impact is large in the long term, after the dynamic adjustment process, although it is small in the short term.
AB - The literature on trade openness, economic development, and the environment is largely inconclusive about the environmental consequences of trade. This study treats trade and income as endogenous and estimates the overall impact of trade openness on environmental quality using the instrumental variables technique. We find that whether or not trade has a beneficial effect on the environment varies depending on the pollutant and the country. Trade is found to benefit the environment in OECD countries. It has detrimental effects, however, on sulfur dioxide (SO2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in non-OECD countries, although it does lower biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) emissions in these countries. We also find the impact is large in the long term, after the dynamic adjustment process, although it is small in the short term.
KW - Comparative advantage
KW - Composition effect
KW - Environment
KW - Environmental regulations effect
KW - Scale effect
KW - Technique effect
KW - Trade openness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349849504&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349849504&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jeem.2009.04.008
DO - 10.1016/j.jeem.2009.04.008
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:70349849504
SN - 0095-0696
VL - 58
SP - 346
EP - 363
JO - Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
JF - Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
IS - 3
ER -