TY - JOUR
T1 - Dynamic control of rural-urban migration
AU - Itoh, Ryo
N1 - Funding Information:
The author is grateful to Komei Sasaki, Asao Ando, Tatsuhito Kono, Ryo Horii, and Hajime Kawamukai, and to the editor and two anonymous referees of this journal for their helpful comments. The preliminary version of the present study was presented in the seminar of Tokyo University and in the ARSC conference in Tottori. I also thank the participants for their suggestions. The author acknowledges the financial support of a Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows (18-5133).
PY - 2009/11
Y1 - 2009/11
N2 - This study investigates the optimal urbanization control of an underdeveloped economy by specifying a simple dynamic rural-urban model in which the urban sector bears both an intertemporal positive externality and a simultaneous negative externality. The dynamic optimization problem is solved for the political intervention of the central government in an intersectoral population distribution with taxes and subsidies. Our analysis provides the following results: (i) a big-push policy that leads an economy to a higher-income steady state with urbanization is not necessarily desirable if the government cannot borrow money at a sufficiently low interest rate; (ii) in order to sustain an appropriate urbanization speed, urbanization control policy should have a switch: the urban sector should be subsidized in order to accelerate rural-urban migration in early stages of development, and taxed to decelerate and eventually cease the migration in later stages.
AB - This study investigates the optimal urbanization control of an underdeveloped economy by specifying a simple dynamic rural-urban model in which the urban sector bears both an intertemporal positive externality and a simultaneous negative externality. The dynamic optimization problem is solved for the political intervention of the central government in an intersectoral population distribution with taxes and subsidies. Our analysis provides the following results: (i) a big-push policy that leads an economy to a higher-income steady state with urbanization is not necessarily desirable if the government cannot borrow money at a sufficiently low interest rate; (ii) in order to sustain an appropriate urbanization speed, urbanization control policy should have a switch: the urban sector should be subsidized in order to accelerate rural-urban migration in early stages of development, and taxed to decelerate and eventually cease the migration in later stages.
KW - Big-push
KW - Optimal urbanization control
KW - Rural-urban migration
KW - Speed of urbanization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349431108&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349431108&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jue.2009.07.001
DO - 10.1016/j.jue.2009.07.001
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:70349431108
SN - 0094-1190
VL - 66
SP - 196
EP - 202
JO - Journal of Urban Economics
JF - Journal of Urban Economics
IS - 3
ER -