TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of nozzle geometry on a standard cavitation erosion test using a cavitating jet
AU - Soyama, Hitoshi
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was partly supported by The Canon Foundation and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science under a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) 24360040 . The author thanks Mr. M. Mikami, technician, Tohoku University for his help in the experiments.
PY - 2013/1/15
Y1 - 2013/1/15
N2 - In order to accurately and reliably evaluate the cavitation erosion resistance of materials using cavitating jet apparatus according to ASTM G134, the effect of various types of nozzle geometries on the erosion rate was investigated. As the erosion rate depends on the erosion time and the distance from the nozzle to the specimen, i.e., the standoff distance, the mass loss as a function of erosion time at the optimum standoff distance was measured. It was shown that the erosion rate depended on the nozzle geometry. In fact, the aggressive intensity of the cavitating jet IJ depends on the nozzle geometry. When a cavitating jet of low IJ was used in the erosion test, it took some time to reach the maximum cumulative erosion rate ERmax, which is recommended in ASTM G134 as a parameter for determining the cavitation erosion resistance of materials. In the present experiment, the difference in ERmax was more than 600%, and the time required to reach ERmax was also scattered over 600%, for the different nozzles used. It was also revealed that ERmax could be obtained from the product of IJ and the reciprocal of the relative cavitation erosion resistance of the material, RER.
AB - In order to accurately and reliably evaluate the cavitation erosion resistance of materials using cavitating jet apparatus according to ASTM G134, the effect of various types of nozzle geometries on the erosion rate was investigated. As the erosion rate depends on the erosion time and the distance from the nozzle to the specimen, i.e., the standoff distance, the mass loss as a function of erosion time at the optimum standoff distance was measured. It was shown that the erosion rate depended on the nozzle geometry. In fact, the aggressive intensity of the cavitating jet IJ depends on the nozzle geometry. When a cavitating jet of low IJ was used in the erosion test, it took some time to reach the maximum cumulative erosion rate ERmax, which is recommended in ASTM G134 as a parameter for determining the cavitation erosion resistance of materials. In the present experiment, the difference in ERmax was more than 600%, and the time required to reach ERmax was also scattered over 600%, for the different nozzles used. It was also revealed that ERmax could be obtained from the product of IJ and the reciprocal of the relative cavitation erosion resistance of the material, RER.
KW - Cavitating jet
KW - Cavitation
KW - Erosion
KW - Erosion resistance of material
KW - Nozzle
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870712834&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870712834&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.wear.2012.11.008
DO - 10.1016/j.wear.2012.11.008
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84870712834
SN - 0043-1648
VL - 297
SP - 895
EP - 902
JO - Wear
JF - Wear
IS - 1-2
ER -