TY - JOUR
T1 - Effective apparent diffusion coefficient parameters for differentiation between mass-forming autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
AU - Ren, Hainan
AU - Mori, Naoko
AU - Hamada, Shin
AU - Takasawa, Chiaki
AU - Mugikura, Shunji
AU - Masamune, Atsushi
AU - Takase, Kei
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank Mayu Sawaguchi, Yo Oguma, Kyuhei Takahashi, Naoko Hirose, Kanako Shibui and Kazufumi Watanabe of Tohoku University, for their kind assistance in data collection.
Funding Information:
The funding was provided by JSPS KAKENHI 18K07742. Acknowledgements
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) parameters by region of interest (ROI) methods in differentiating mass-forming autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Methods: The institutional review board approved this retrospective study and the requirement for informed consent was waived. Twenty-three patients with mass-forming AIP and 144 patients with PDAC underwent diffusion-weighted imaging with b-values of 0 s/mm2 and 800 s/mm2. The minimum, maximum, and mean ADC values obtained by placing ROIs within lesions and percentile ADC values (10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th) from entire-lesion histogram analysis were compared between the two groups by using Mann–Whitney U tests. The diagnostic performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: The minimum, maximum, and mean ADC values were significantly different between mass-forming AIP and PDAC groups. ROC curve analysis showed that the maximum ADC had the highest diagnostic performance (0.92), while the minimum ADC value had the lowest diagnostic performance (0.72). The AUC of minimum ADC was significantly lower than that of maximum or mean ADC (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001). The AUC was lowest in 10th percentile ADC value and highest in 90th percentile value. The AUC increased along with the increase of percentile values. Conclusion: Either the maximum or mean ADC value was effective in differentiating mass-forming AIP from the PDAC group, while the minimum ADC value might not be recommended.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) parameters by region of interest (ROI) methods in differentiating mass-forming autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Methods: The institutional review board approved this retrospective study and the requirement for informed consent was waived. Twenty-three patients with mass-forming AIP and 144 patients with PDAC underwent diffusion-weighted imaging with b-values of 0 s/mm2 and 800 s/mm2. The minimum, maximum, and mean ADC values obtained by placing ROIs within lesions and percentile ADC values (10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th) from entire-lesion histogram analysis were compared between the two groups by using Mann–Whitney U tests. The diagnostic performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: The minimum, maximum, and mean ADC values were significantly different between mass-forming AIP and PDAC groups. ROC curve analysis showed that the maximum ADC had the highest diagnostic performance (0.92), while the minimum ADC value had the lowest diagnostic performance (0.72). The AUC of minimum ADC was significantly lower than that of maximum or mean ADC (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001). The AUC was lowest in 10th percentile ADC value and highest in 90th percentile value. The AUC increased along with the increase of percentile values. Conclusion: Either the maximum or mean ADC value was effective in differentiating mass-forming AIP from the PDAC group, while the minimum ADC value might not be recommended.
KW - Apparent diffusion coefficient
KW - Diffusion-weighted imaging
KW - Magnetic resonance imaging
KW - Mass-forming autoimmune pancreatitis
KW - Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092373128&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092373128&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00261-020-02795-x
DO - 10.1007/s00261-020-02795-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 33037891
AN - SCOPUS:85092373128
SN - 2366-004X
VL - 46
SP - 1640
EP - 1647
JO - Abdominal Radiology
JF - Abdominal Radiology
IS - 4
ER -