Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare two endometrial cytologic sampling devices, the Uterobrush and Endocyte, for their clinical applicability. STUDY DESIGN: Specimen collection and comparison in 60 women. RESULTS: Collection of specimens with both devices succeeded in 100% of cases and was practically painless. The cells’ appearance with the Endocyte tended to be dense. Nevertheless, the amount of cells collected with both devices was adequate for diagnosis except in a few cases. CONCLUSION: The Uterobrush method is simple and painless and therefore very acceptable to patients and suitable for clinical use.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 907-910 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Acta Cytologica |
Volume | 40 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1996 |
Keywords
- Endocyte
- Endometrial neoplasms
- Uterobrush
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine
- Histology