Erratum: Microscopic phase-space exploration modeling of Fm 258 spontaneous fission (Physical Review Letters (2017) 118 (152501) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.152501)

Yusuke Tanimura, Denis Lacroix, Sakir Ayik

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In Fig. 1(b), we took experimental data of Ref. [1], where a preselection on an asymmetric event has been made, to compare with our calculation, where there should be no selection. In Fig. 1, we show the comparison between the SMF approach and the data of Ref. [1] with no preselection. The theoretical point is unchanged. We see that the agreement is much better than in our previous conclusion. In particular, the statement "For masses, while fluctuations are increased by a factor of 2 compared to the original TDDFT, the results still underestimate most asymmetric fission" is erroneous. The conclusion is that both total kinetic energy and fragment yields are rather well reproduced simultaneously. (Figure Presented).

Original languageEnglish
Article number059902
JournalPhysical review letters
Volume121
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Jul 31

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: Microscopic phase-space exploration modeling of Fm 258 spontaneous fission (Physical Review Letters (2017) 118 (152501) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.152501)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this