Abstract
The κ-ε{lunate} turbulence model and large-eddy stimulation (LES) are used to predict the 3D flow field around a surface-mounted cubic model. Comparison of the results from κ-ε{lunate} modelling with those from a wind tunnel test reveals several significant discrepancies. The results of LES agree fairly well with the experimental data. The shortcomings of the κ-ε{lunate} model are examined precisely, using the numerical data given by LES. The major inaccuracies of the κ-ε{lunate} model are its overestimation of the value of the turbulence energy κ around the frontal corner and its understimation of the value of the lateral component of normal stress <u2′u2′> in the recirculation region behind the model. The first inaccuracy is concerned with the expression for evaluating the turbulence production of κ under eddy viscosity modelling and the second is caused by the unsuccessful reproduction of Karman's vortex street.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 87-100 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics |
Volume | 35 |
Issue number | C |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1990 |
Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Civil and Structural Engineering
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- Mechanical Engineering