TY - JOUR
T1 - Experience with prognostic disclosure of families of japanese patients with cancer
AU - Yoshida, Saran
AU - Hirai, Kei
AU - Morita, Tatsuya
AU - Shiozaki, Mariko
AU - Miyashita, Mitsunori
AU - Sato, Kazuki
AU - Tsuneto, Satoru
AU - Shima, Yasuo
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid from the Japan Hospice Palliative Care Foundation and partly by a Grant-in-Aid for Cancer Research from the Japanese Ministry of Labor, Health and Welfare . The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
PY - 2011/3
Y1 - 2011/3
N2 - Context: Prognosis is difficult to discuss with patients who have advanced cancer and their families. Objectives: This study aimed to explore the experiences of families of patients with cancer in Japan in receiving prognostic disclosure, explore family perception of the way the prognosis was communicated, and investigate relevant factors of family-perceived need for improvement. Methods: A multicenter questionnaire survey was conducted with 666 bereaved family members of patients with cancer who were admitted to palliative care units in Japan. Results: In total, 86.3% of the families received prognostic disclosure. The overall evaluation revealed that 60.1% of the participants felt that the method of prognostic disclosure needed some, considerable, or much improvement. The parameter with the highest value explaining the necessity for improvement was the family perception that the amount of information provided by the physician was insufficient (beta = 0.39, P < 0.001). Furthermore, the family perception that they had lost hope and that health care providers failed to facilitate preparation for the patient's death had significant direct effects on the necessity for improvement (beta = 0.21, P < 0.001; and beta = 0.18, P < 0.001, respectively). The feelings for the necessity for improvement also were affected significantly by seven communication strategies (i.e., not saying "I can do nothing for the patient any longer," pacing explanation with the state of the patient's and family's preparation, saying "We will respect the patient's wishes," making an effort to understand the family's distress, being knowledgeable about the most advanced treatments, assuring continuing responsibility as the physician for medical care, and respecting the family's values). Conclusion: This model suggests that strategies for care providers to improve family perception about prognostic disclosure should include 1) providing as much prognostic information as families want; 2) supporting families' hopes by keeping up with up-to-date treatments and by assuring the continuing responsibility for medical care; 3) facilitating the preparation for the patient's death by providing information in consideration of the family's preparations and values; 4) stressing what they can do instead of saying that nothing can be done for the patient; and 5) assuring the family that they will respect the patient's wishes.
AB - Context: Prognosis is difficult to discuss with patients who have advanced cancer and their families. Objectives: This study aimed to explore the experiences of families of patients with cancer in Japan in receiving prognostic disclosure, explore family perception of the way the prognosis was communicated, and investigate relevant factors of family-perceived need for improvement. Methods: A multicenter questionnaire survey was conducted with 666 bereaved family members of patients with cancer who were admitted to palliative care units in Japan. Results: In total, 86.3% of the families received prognostic disclosure. The overall evaluation revealed that 60.1% of the participants felt that the method of prognostic disclosure needed some, considerable, or much improvement. The parameter with the highest value explaining the necessity for improvement was the family perception that the amount of information provided by the physician was insufficient (beta = 0.39, P < 0.001). Furthermore, the family perception that they had lost hope and that health care providers failed to facilitate preparation for the patient's death had significant direct effects on the necessity for improvement (beta = 0.21, P < 0.001; and beta = 0.18, P < 0.001, respectively). The feelings for the necessity for improvement also were affected significantly by seven communication strategies (i.e., not saying "I can do nothing for the patient any longer," pacing explanation with the state of the patient's and family's preparation, saying "We will respect the patient's wishes," making an effort to understand the family's distress, being knowledgeable about the most advanced treatments, assuring continuing responsibility as the physician for medical care, and respecting the family's values). Conclusion: This model suggests that strategies for care providers to improve family perception about prognostic disclosure should include 1) providing as much prognostic information as families want; 2) supporting families' hopes by keeping up with up-to-date treatments and by assuring the continuing responsibility for medical care; 3) facilitating the preparation for the patient's death by providing information in consideration of the family's preparations and values; 4) stressing what they can do instead of saying that nothing can be done for the patient; and 5) assuring the family that they will respect the patient's wishes.
KW - Japan
KW - Prognostic disclosure
KW - cancer
KW - communication
KW - family
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952812768&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952812768&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.06.013
DO - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.06.013
M3 - Article
C2 - 21145699
AN - SCOPUS:79952812768
SN - 0885-3924
VL - 41
SP - 594
EP - 603
JO - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
JF - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
IS - 3
ER -