TY - JOUR
T1 - Factors for inconsistent aerosol single scattering albedo between SKYNET and AERONET
AU - Khatri, P.
AU - Takamura, T.
AU - Nakajima, T.
AU - Estellés, V.
AU - Irie, H.
AU - Kuze, H.
AU - Campanelli, M.
AU - Sinyuk, A.
AU - Lee, S. M.
AU - Sohn, B. J.
AU - Pandithurai, G.
AU - Kim, S. W.
AU - Yoon, S. C.
AU - Martinez-Lozano, J. A.
AU - Hashimoto, M.
AU - Devara, P. C.S.
AU - Manago, N.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by “Improvement of Terrestrial Science Data Availability and Development of the Energy Demand Models for a Cooperative Distributed Energy Management System” project of JST/ CREST/EMS, Japan, “Virtual Laboratory for Diagnosing the Earth’s Climate System” program of MEXT, Japan, and the Japan Society for the promotion of science (JSPS) research grant (grant 24510007). The participation of the University of Valencia was possible thanks to projects from the Valencia Autonomous Government, the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, and the European Regional Development Fund (GV/2014/ 046, CGL2011-24290, CGL2010-18782, CGL2012-33294, and PROMETEUII/2014/058). All AERONET data used in this study are available at http://aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov/. SKYNET data of Chiba (Japan), Pune (India), and Seoul (Korea) corresponding to Skyrad. pack (version 4.2) are available at http:// atmos2.cr.chiba-u.jp/skynet, and those for Valencia (Spain) at http://www. euroskyrad.net/index.html. SKYNET data corresponding to other versions of Skyrad.pack can be available from the first author upon request (pradee-p@restaff.chiba-u.jp). Thanks to the three reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions on an earlier version of the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2016/2/27
Y1 - 2016/2/27
N2 - SKYNET and Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) retrieved aerosol single scattering albedo (SSA) values of four sites, Chiba (Japan), Pune (India), Valencia (Spain), and Seoul (Korea), were compared to understand the factors behind often noted large SSA differences between them. SKYNET and AERONET algorithms are found to produce nearly same SSAs for similarity in input data, suggesting that SSA differences between them are primarily due to quality of input data due to different calibration and/or observation protocols as well as difference in quality assurance criteria. The most plausible reason for high SSAs in SKYNET is found to be underestimated calibration constant for sky radiance (ΔΩ). The disk scan method (scan area: 1° × 1° area of solar disk) of SKYNET is noted to produce stable wavelength-dependent ΔΩ values in comparison to those determined from the integrating sphere used by AERONET to calibrate sky radiance. Aerosol optical thickness (AOT) difference between them can be the next important factor for their SSA difference, if AOTs between them are not consistent. Inconsistent values of surface albedo while analyzing data of SKYNET and AERONET can also bring SSA difference between them, but the effect of surface albedo is secondary. The aerosol nonsphericity effect is found to be less important for SSA difference between these two networks.
AB - SKYNET and Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) retrieved aerosol single scattering albedo (SSA) values of four sites, Chiba (Japan), Pune (India), Valencia (Spain), and Seoul (Korea), were compared to understand the factors behind often noted large SSA differences between them. SKYNET and AERONET algorithms are found to produce nearly same SSAs for similarity in input data, suggesting that SSA differences between them are primarily due to quality of input data due to different calibration and/or observation protocols as well as difference in quality assurance criteria. The most plausible reason for high SSAs in SKYNET is found to be underestimated calibration constant for sky radiance (ΔΩ). The disk scan method (scan area: 1° × 1° area of solar disk) of SKYNET is noted to produce stable wavelength-dependent ΔΩ values in comparison to those determined from the integrating sphere used by AERONET to calibrate sky radiance. Aerosol optical thickness (AOT) difference between them can be the next important factor for their SSA difference, if AOTs between them are not consistent. Inconsistent values of surface albedo while analyzing data of SKYNET and AERONET can also bring SSA difference between them, but the effect of surface albedo is secondary. The aerosol nonsphericity effect is found to be less important for SSA difference between these two networks.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959421066&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959421066&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/2015JD023976
DO - 10.1002/2015JD023976
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84959421066
SN - 0148-0227
VL - 121
SP - 1859
EP - 1877
JO - Journal of Geophysical Research
JF - Journal of Geophysical Research
IS - 4
ER -