From the respective expert viewpoints of the ANM specialty editors

Masayuki Inubushi, Miho Shidahara, Yasuyuki Takahashi, Mikako Ogawa, Yasushi Kiyono

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)


Although it may not be well known, the Annals of Nuclear Medicine (ANM) Editorial Committee includes one specialty editor of nuclear medicine physics, one of nuclear medicine technology, one of molecular imaging, and two of radiopharmacology. In addition, a statistics editor and a language editor are also on the committee. Manuscripts submitted to ANM can be peer-reviewed by such specialty editors similar to those submitted to highly ranked journals, which is a great pride and joy to us. To offer our readers a condensed global view on the high-quality research work in the field of nuclear medicine, we have published a mini-review article every year under the joint authorship of the ANM associate editors since 2016. This is our fourth serial review article written by the ANM specialty editors from their respective expert viewpoints.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)877-880
Number of pages4
JournalAnnals of Nuclear Medicine
Issue number12
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Dec 1


  • F-labeled boron-derived methionine analogue (F-B-MET)
  • Dosimetry
  • Harmonic PET
  • meta-[At]Astato-benzyguanidine (At-MABG)
  • Multimodal imaging


Dive into the research topics of 'From the respective expert viewpoints of the ANM specialty editors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this