Functional differences among BRCA1 missense mutations in the control of centrosome duplication

Z. Kais, N. Chiba, C. Ishioka, J. D. Parvin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We analyzed the effects of 14 different missense mutations in the RING domain of BRCA1 on the function of the protein in the control of centrosome number in tissue culture cells. Whereas 2 of the 14 BRCA1 variant proteins were neutral in the centrosome duplication assay, missense mutations of zinc-coordinating residues (C24R, C27A, C39Y, H41F, C44F and C47G) and mutations encoding BRCA1 variants M18T and I42V resulted in BRCA1 proteins that caused centrosome amplification. BRCA1 variant proteins I21V, I31M, L52F and D67Y had an intermediate effect on centrosome duplication. In addition, one of the variants, L52F, caused a peculiar phenotype with amplified centrosomes but the centrioles remained paired. By comparison, other BRCA1 variants that caused centrosome amplification had clustering of supernumerary centrosomes with unpaired centrioles. This surprising phenotype suggests that the BRCA1 protein regulates two functions in the control of centrosome duplication: regulation of centrosome number and regulation of centriole pairing. The L52F is unusual as it is defective in only one of these processes. This study analyzes the function of BRCA1 missense mutations in the control of centrosome duplication, a critical step in the maintenance of genetic stability of mammary epithelial cells, and indicates a new function of BRCA1 in the control of centriole pairing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)799-804
Number of pages6
JournalOncogene
Volume31
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Feb

Keywords

  • BRCA1
  • RING domain
  • breast cancer
  • centrosomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Functional differences among BRCA1 missense mutations in the control of centrosome duplication'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this