Genetic Variability and Differentiation of Both Cultured Strains and Natural Populations in the Guppy Poecilia reticulata

Anna Alexandrovna Barinova, Masamichi Nakajima, Yoshihisa Fujio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To characterize genetically both natural populations and cultured strains of the guppy (Poecilia reticulata), enzyme polymorphism was examined by starch gel electrophoresis. There are three kind of natural populations: wild populations, natural populations which have originated from the introduction of wild guppy and reversion to the wild state of the domesticated guppy (introduced populations). While the cultured strains have originated from the guppy which have been maintained in pet shops and established as strains. The screening of genetic variation at 30 loci revealed that the introduced populations were significantly higher than the cultured strains in the amount of genetic variability. The quantification of genetic differentiation revealed that the cultured strains were more diversified than the introduced populations. The genetic variability of the introduced populations was the similar level in comparison with the wild populations of Trinidadian guppy. The degree of genetic differentiation of the wild Trinidadian populations was significantly more diversified than the introduced populations of the present work. The decrease of genetic variability and increase of genetic differentiation would be caused by founder effect at the division of the population.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)898-902
Number of pages5
JournalFisheries Science
Volume64
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1998 Dec

Keywords

  • Average heterozygosity
  • Cultured strain
  • Founder effect
  • G
  • Guppy
  • Isozyme
  • Natural population

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Genetic Variability and Differentiation of Both Cultured Strains and Natural Populations in the Guppy Poecilia reticulata'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this