TY - JOUR
T1 - Haemodynamics in a patient-specific intracranial aneurysm according to experimental and numerical approaches
T2 - A comparison of PIV, CFD and PC-MRI
AU - Li, Yujie
AU - Yoneyama, Yuuya
AU - Isoda, Haruo
AU - Terada, Masaki
AU - Kosugi, Takafumi
AU - Kosugi, Takashi
AU - Zhang, Mingzi
AU - Ohta, Makoto
N1 - Funding Information:
We acknowledge financial support received from the ImPACT Program of the Council for Science, Technology and Innovation (Cabinet Office, Government of Japan). This work was also supported by the JSPS KAKENHI programme (Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research) (Grant Number 25293264). We thank Prof. Osamu Sasaki and Dr. Harumasa Kano for their technical support in MicroCT scanning at the Museum of Natural History, Tohoku University.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 - IOS Press. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Background: The haemodynamics determined by different approaches for studying fluid dynamics - i.e. computational fluid dynamics (CFD), particle image velocimetry (PIV), and phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) - have rarely been thoroughly compared; nor have the factors that affect accuracy and precision in each method. As each method has its own advantages and limitations, this knowledge is important for future studies to be able to achieve valid analyses of fluid flows. Objective: To gauge the capacity of these methods for analysing aneurysmal flows, we compared the haemodynamic behaviours determined by each method within a patient-specific aneurysm model. Methods: An in vitro silicone aneurysm model was fabricated for PIV and PC-MRI, and an in silico aneurysm model with the same geometry was reconstructed for CFD. With the same fluid model prepared numerically and physically, CFD, PIV and PC-MRI were performed to study aneurysmal haemodynamics. Results: 2D velocity vectors and magnitudes show good agreement between PIV and CFD, and 3D flow patterns show good similarity between PC-MRI and CFD. Conclusions: These findings give confidence to future haemodynamic studies using CFD technology. For the first time, the morphological inconsistency between the PCMRI model and others is found to affect the measurement of local flow patterns.
AB - Background: The haemodynamics determined by different approaches for studying fluid dynamics - i.e. computational fluid dynamics (CFD), particle image velocimetry (PIV), and phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) - have rarely been thoroughly compared; nor have the factors that affect accuracy and precision in each method. As each method has its own advantages and limitations, this knowledge is important for future studies to be able to achieve valid analyses of fluid flows. Objective: To gauge the capacity of these methods for analysing aneurysmal flows, we compared the haemodynamic behaviours determined by each method within a patient-specific aneurysm model. Methods: An in vitro silicone aneurysm model was fabricated for PIV and PC-MRI, and an in silico aneurysm model with the same geometry was reconstructed for CFD. With the same fluid model prepared numerically and physically, CFD, PIV and PC-MRI were performed to study aneurysmal haemodynamics. Results: 2D velocity vectors and magnitudes show good agreement between PIV and CFD, and 3D flow patterns show good similarity between PC-MRI and CFD. Conclusions: These findings give confidence to future haemodynamic studies using CFD technology. For the first time, the morphological inconsistency between the PCMRI model and others is found to affect the measurement of local flow patterns.
KW - Comparison
KW - computational fluid dynamics (CFD)
KW - haemodynamics
KW - intracranial aneurysms
KW - particle image velocimetry (PIV)
KW - phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102891550&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85102891550&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3233/THC-202252
DO - 10.3233/THC-202252
M3 - Article
C2 - 32568138
AN - SCOPUS:85102891550
SN - 0928-7329
VL - 29
SP - 253
EP - 267
JO - Technology and Health Care
JF - Technology and Health Care
IS - 2
ER -