TY - JOUR
T1 - Health economic effect of donepezil treatment for CDR 0.5 converters to Alzheimer's disease as shown by the Markov model
AU - Kasuya, Masashi
AU - Meguro, Kenichi
PY - 2010/5
Y1 - 2010/5
N2 - The previous health economic simulation of donepezil based on the Markov model revealed the treatment for mild to moderate stage of Alzheimer disease (AD) to be cost-effective. Our aim was to examine the economic effect of donepezil treatment for mild cognitive impairment, from which about 15% convert to dementia per year. We constructed a new Markov model using three simulations. Namely, Simulation A hypothesized that mild AD patients, i.e., Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) 1, received donepezil as in the previous study. Simulation B hypothesized that all CDR 0.5 subjects received donepezil, and Simulation C considered that only the CDR 0.5 converters to dementia received donepezil. We calculated the models as follows: Simulation B, supposes that the annual transition probabilities were reduced even from 15% to 10% by donepezil, however, the drug had a negative economic effect. By contrast, in Simulation C, the annual transition probability was reduced from only 15% to 12% by donepezil, there was a positive economic effect. Since it is necessary to reduce the annual transition probability from 15% to 12% in order to manifest a concomitant economic benefit, we consider that early detection of CDR 0.5 converters in the community is important for health policy planning.
AB - The previous health economic simulation of donepezil based on the Markov model revealed the treatment for mild to moderate stage of Alzheimer disease (AD) to be cost-effective. Our aim was to examine the economic effect of donepezil treatment for mild cognitive impairment, from which about 15% convert to dementia per year. We constructed a new Markov model using three simulations. Namely, Simulation A hypothesized that mild AD patients, i.e., Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) 1, received donepezil as in the previous study. Simulation B hypothesized that all CDR 0.5 subjects received donepezil, and Simulation C considered that only the CDR 0.5 converters to dementia received donepezil. We calculated the models as follows: Simulation B, supposes that the annual transition probabilities were reduced even from 15% to 10% by donepezil, however, the drug had a negative economic effect. By contrast, in Simulation C, the annual transition probability was reduced from only 15% to 12% by donepezil, there was a positive economic effect. Since it is necessary to reduce the annual transition probability from 15% to 12% in order to manifest a concomitant economic benefit, we consider that early detection of CDR 0.5 converters in the community is important for health policy planning.
KW - Alzheimer's disease
KW - Clinical Dementia Rating 0.5
KW - Cost-utility analysis
KW - Donepezil
KW - Mild cognitive impairment
KW - Quality-adjusted life years
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77649192580&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77649192580&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.archger.2009.04.014
DO - 10.1016/j.archger.2009.04.014
M3 - Article
C2 - 19481822
AN - SCOPUS:77649192580
SN - 0167-4943
VL - 50
SP - 295
EP - 299
JO - Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
JF - Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
IS - 3
ER -